More choice, I reckon, but only because of the wider pool of candidates. I don't see why fancying both should make a person any more or less difficult to please than they would be otherwise. I still want good hygiene (HART LOOKING AT YOU) and being a looker never hurts and someone who won't be too fussed about my sleeping habits.
Of course, if I were to pick out someone now, they'd have to be able to deal with Jack, too. That does narrow the band quite a bit.
I think someone who doesn't mind that I can't choose who to arrest, like I'm not a superhero or anything, and taller and understanding of basic car structure, and rugby, and looks good in lingerie...
Or passing at good on the way to excellent in lingerie; I am woth that.
Bet she keeps the hat on in bed. Not saying I'd be disappointed, mind you.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Cope? Do you know how much sex I have? Isn't this every man's dream?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Besides, I still fancy women, I'm just not sleeping with any at the moment. Like you, all the women I know are either workmates or aliens suspects.
Reply
Do I ask the obvious, how's the being bi, more choice or less choice? or more choice because you'r more difficult to please??
Reply
Of course, if I were to pick out someone now, they'd have to be able to deal with Jack, too. That does narrow the band quite a bit.
Reply
Or passing at good on the way to excellent in lingerie; I am woth that.
Reply
He's a bit iffy on rugby but you can't have everything.
Reply
Leave a comment