[cfuw 100] Heat-san's team.

Jul 08, 2009 21:33

I haven't talked to either of you yet, but Takumi said we should open a post to your team.

cfuw100, ic, cfuw

Leave a comment

vore_crimes July 9 2009, 01:15:30 UTC
Sorry I'm back so late. I was out with my tribe.

Reply

doesntjustifaiz July 9 2009, 01:18:04 UTC
It's okay, it's quiet at the moment. I'm Sonoda, Sonoda Mari, by the way.

Reply

vore_crimes July 9 2009, 01:19:56 UTC
Heat of the Embryon Tribe.

Reply

doesntjustifaiz July 9 2009, 01:23:05 UTC
Heat-san, there's a new clue, and the teams implicated are Partnerības, Kumppanuus and Şirket.

Reply

vore_crimes July 9 2009, 01:25:51 UTC
Yeah, sorry. I just caught up and saw that.

Reply

autovajin July 9 2009, 01:22:34 UTC
What do you think about this whole mess?

Reply

vore_crimes July 9 2009, 01:27:11 UTC
I think the clue from the first day's ended up a mess, and I'd say that whether or not it turns out I'm in it.

Today's clue's clearer. I've got some suspicions, but I was out all day and I'm still catching up to see what people were saying today.

Reply

doesntjustifaiz July 9 2009, 01:29:29 UTC
I agree . . . I wonder whether the shepherds would let us exchange gold stars for the right clue. I just want to know who I'm supposed to be looking at.

Reply

vore_crimes July 9 2009, 01:32:48 UTC
Yeah. I really don't like thinking that someone could be taking advantage of the confusion to get three sheep teams interpreted as the teams in the clue. I've seen a lot of pretty vehement convictions for who the clues might mean all around, and it's really easy to imagine a wolf being one of the people arguing so strongly.

Reply

doesntjustifaiz July 9 2009, 01:35:42 UTC
Or the other way around, wolves arguing that it's really not them.

Reply

vore_crimes July 9 2009, 01:37:24 UTC
It's possible, yeah. Making a clue unclear is a good defense. But when the clue's already clear and people are insisting there's an obvious and clear read of it, that definitely catches my eye more than when a clue's unclear and people are arguing that because it's unclear it doesn't apply. Then again, my bias in that is pretty damn obvious, huh?

Reply

doesntjustifaiz July 9 2009, 01:44:01 UTC
Umm . . . you mean when the clue's unclear and people insist it's obvious and clear, right? Though, when I said that, I was thinking of this. I'm not saying they're wolves or even in the clue, but she won't even entertain the thought, and her partner hasn't even seen my comment, it looks like.

Reply

vore_crimes July 9 2009, 01:49:48 UTC
Yeah, sorry.

Yeah... I saw that. I did find it sort of weird, if just because the clue's so hard to figure out that volunteering anything that could be related is helpful. I mean, on the other side of things, nobody wants to be in a clue since it raises the risk of being voted out because there's a "better chance" of getting a wolf than picking people not in a clue, but it's still better for the group to just come out with shit.

Reply

autovajin July 9 2009, 01:31:26 UTC
Agreed. There are votes on some teams already.

Reply

vore_crimes July 9 2009, 01:33:32 UTC
Yeah. I'm one of them. I've voted suspicion since coming back, since a team I've been suspicious of since yesterday is in the clue. I wanted to wait for Canaan, but he's going to be out until sometime during ousting.

Reply

autovajin July 9 2009, 01:34:43 UTC
What suspicions do you have and on who?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up