Leave a comment

arkadelos June 7 2011, 11:55:07 UTC
I think River's timeline essentially goes backwards, but can tend to bounce around a lot ( ... )

Reply

rhiannon_s June 7 2011, 12:11:15 UTC
Yeah, it isn't purely back to front, it is also jumbled up. It is a back and forth, jumbley-wumbley, timey-wimey life.

Reply

wulfae June 7 2011, 15:30:11 UTC
If it was purely back to front, then there would be no point in the books, because neither she nor the Doctor would have any experiences in common.

I think she's just saying 'his past is my future' to sort of simplify explaining it to everyone.

Reply

rinnychan June 7 2011, 16:28:00 UTC
Agreed. It's not set in stone that they will always meet in the exact wrong order, but rather a coincidence that happens repeatedly.

Reply

niyalune June 7 2011, 22:38:09 UTC
Well said. I also think they're going only mostly in opposite directions, not totally. It would be a bit dull otherwise ^^
Although, I wonder when the Doctor will realise they're mostly back to front and if he'll have another reaction than "spoilers are frustrating". River is understandably upset about it :(

Reply


Leave a comment

Up