If you haven't yet read Jim Rittenhouse's 8-part synthesis on the NOLA disaster...

Sep 06, 2005 03:07

You can start here.

Jim takes a lot (a lot) of information and pulls it together into a remarkably coherent discourse on the causes, time-lines, and fallout of the many factors that brought New Orleans to disaster. It started well before Katrina, and it's hardly done yet.

Seriously, give it a read. All 8 parts.

Leave a comment

marsgov September 6 2005, 17:59:37 UTC
I've read the first few parts, and I am underwhelmed. It's just a re-hash of the attempts to shift blame to the Bush administration, along with the stunning it's-the-fault-of-the-war-in-Iraq song that's being sung everywhere.

Reply

docstrange September 6 2005, 18:12:51 UTC
Well, read all the way through. He blames a lot of parties.

Also, do you actually hold the Bush administration blameless on this one?

I don't think there is much doubt that the administration ignored several of its own internal critical resources, including the Army Corps of Engineers. Whether they did so based on a clear resources calculation or some other basis isn't clear. What is also pretty clear is that FEMA, despite a powerful mandate, has utterly failed in its core mission, as has the "all hazards" approach of homeland security. Not that prevention was possible, but certainly preparation would have been.

Reply

cheesetruck September 6 2005, 18:36:25 UTC
Yes, because lynching a scapegoat is always the way to reform.

Reply

marsgov September 6 2005, 19:07:13 UTC
I think it's way the heck too early to start handing out blame, because right now we're operating in the "fog of war," at least in my opinion. So his handing out blame, and attempting to push responsibilty upwards for everything that went wrong, is simply unjustified at this time ( ... )

Reply

docstrange September 6 2005, 21:20:19 UTC
I agree it's too early to assign blame, though clearly there are some dropped balls both locally and federally. I can't see how FEMA didn't blow it, however.

On the race-baiting - well, I suspect if there was any real disregard for the folks in NOLA, it was because of economics and not race, since many of those affected along the coastline where the storm center came through were really 'lower income' rather than any particular ethnic group. The adults in the Dem party are of course those you're not hearing since they're biding their time; or those you're hearing who are asking for answers to specific failings, rather than flailing around pointing fingers.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up