Examiner.com is apparently going through a major redesign/rework of their web presence. One of the effects this has had is to delay things being published. Apparently especially "first articles", I guess. The article I wrote to prove I was planning to has not yet appeared; the one I wrote second has. Find me at
Read more... )
Apropos this subject, a friend of mine (who is an immigration policy wonk) posted this awhile back as a comment on my FB page: "Most folks who bitch about "anchor babies" cite statistics that purport to show that some welfare hospital in a border state (like California or Arizona) has some shockingly high percentage of births to mothers wh...o are here illegally. But in fact (the US Commission on Immigration Reform [chaired by Barbara Jordan; my friend was a Commission staffer] heard testimony about this in 1993), what really happens is that those hospitals which are required to take mothers in labor who don't have insurance (which is why this happens in welfare hospitals) simply refuse to ask for SSNs when the mom doesn't have insurance. That way they get reimbursed faster." I believe my friend but don't see why not asking for SSNs should lead to faster reimbursement. Maybe there's an article there.
Reply
Leave a comment