"No, we are no more enemies than we were before. Like i say: he's like this ALL THE TIME. I think the rest of the conversation went pretty much like this.... Jacob-Well, i'm off to watch charmed, bye.... George:Yeh Peach Out i'll call you about our jam tomorry. I might add at this point that he never answered his phone about the jam! The reason i posted this is because i know that i am right because everybody know what you mean when you say "everything you say is unoriginal". To get bogged down in semantics the way he does is just unconstructive and detrimental to MAINSTREAM society."
Surely, from this reply alone everyone can see how full of shit George is. If I were you, I would assess your friendship with this clown... because it seems to me he would not appreciate anyone (let alone his “friends”). He sounds to me like a pompous, arrogant, self-interested belligerent arsehole.
Anyway the point is: George is COMPLETELY wrong! We sure as hell do not have a language without semantics (and we certainly need to acknowledge that to say something is not the same as thinking something). And I don't get what he meant by "...to get bogged down in semantics the way he does is just unconstructive and detrimental to MAINSTREAM society " What is that supposed to mean? Mainstream society? I doubt George himself even knows what he meant by that comment. It is constructive to point out that george is a fraud. How the hell the it is “detrimental” to “mainstream society” I will never understand.
I mean come on people... is it not so painfully clear the guy has no clue what he's talking about, but tries so very hard to seem as though he does.
Thankyou once again for commenting on this journal. I have a couple of questions for you. 1. What exactly did you hope to acheive by commenting here? Ever since you arrived you've described me as pompous, arrogant and full of shit, but you still stick around to read and reply to my posts. You seem to be a smart guy, Karl, perhaps instead of criticising my journal, you could start one of your own and lead by example. Did you think that commenting here would cause me to change my way of life? Did you think I would say something along the lines of "Oh god, Karl B has challenged my way of thinking! Now i will devote my life to helping my fellow man"? I mean what the fuck dude? You rock up at my livejournal (which you're entirely welcome to do, it's not friends only) and start going on about how much of a clown you think i am, and yet you provide know information about yourself or that guy that bought you the shiny soapbox upon which you stand. Who the fuck are you Karl? The good-taste police? If you don't want to read my journal, don't. Go read one of those sophisticated, thought-provoking, logically structured journals you like so much and forget you ever came here. Alternatively, i suppose you could trawl the internet forever picking on random guys' journals.
"No, we are no more enemies than we were before. Like i say: he's like this ALL THE TIME. I think the rest of the conversation went pretty much like this.... Jacob-Well, i'm off to watch charmed, bye.... George:Yeh Peach Out i'll call you about our jam tomorry. I might add at this point that he never answered his phone about the jam!
The reason i posted this is because i know that i am right because everybody know what you mean when you say "everything you say is unoriginal". To get bogged down in semantics the way he does is just unconstructive and detrimental to MAINSTREAM society."
Surely, from this reply alone everyone can see how full of shit George is. If I were you, I would assess your friendship with this clown... because it seems to me he would not appreciate anyone (let alone his “friends”). He sounds to me like a pompous, arrogant, self-interested belligerent arsehole.
Anyway the point is:
George is COMPLETELY wrong! We sure as hell do not have a language without semantics (and we certainly need to acknowledge that to say something is not the same as thinking something). And I don't get what he meant by "...to get bogged down in semantics the way he does is just unconstructive and detrimental to MAINSTREAM society " What is that supposed to mean? Mainstream society? I doubt George himself even knows what he meant by that comment. It is constructive to point out that george is a fraud. How the hell the it is “detrimental” to “mainstream society” I will never understand.
I mean come on people... is it not so painfully clear the guy has no clue what he's talking about, but tries so very hard to seem as though he does.
And no I do not have a live-journal.
Reply
Thankyou once again for commenting on this journal. I have a couple of questions for you.
1. What exactly did you hope to acheive by commenting here? Ever since you arrived you've described me as pompous, arrogant and full of shit, but you still stick around to read and reply to my posts. You seem to be a smart guy, Karl, perhaps instead of criticising my journal, you could start one of your own and lead by example. Did you think that commenting here would cause me to change my way of life? Did you think I would say something along the lines of "Oh god, Karl B has challenged my way of thinking! Now i will devote my life to helping my fellow man"? I mean what the fuck dude? You rock up at my livejournal (which you're entirely welcome to do, it's not friends only) and start going on about how much of a clown you think i am, and yet you provide know information about yourself or that guy that bought you the shiny soapbox upon which you stand. Who the fuck are you Karl? The good-taste police? If you don't want to read my journal, don't. Go read one of those sophisticated, thought-provoking, logically structured journals you like so much and forget you ever came here. Alternatively, i suppose you could trawl the internet forever picking on random guys' journals.
Peach Out
Reply
Jacob
Reply
Leave a comment