I've read a fair few live-journals in my time, and I've noticed some people express interesting, informative and logically set out pieces... yours, I'm afraid to say is not one of those.
I've read the majority of your entries before making this post (just to confirm my points) and it is now clear to me your entries are full of shit. They are pointless babble and do not make the least bit of sense.
For example, in this your most recent post... your friend is 100% right, everything said verbally is completely unique and original, and furthermore he is correct in his assertion that what someone says is by no means necessarily what they think, for example LIES!! Which your "journal" is filled with.
I'd like to draw everyone's attention to the previous entry before this one (re: george's hatred of police). Your article had very little to do with police!! I mean look how big that post was, and its only at the very end we learn briefly about george's absurd conclusions as to why he hates police. First of all it would be very safe to say that george has probably only seen (not even dealt with!) 0.01% of the world's police. Secondly, how do we know this giant policeman that george claims was apparently the devil in earthly form was not indeed attempting to drive george's hoodlum associates to jail where they belong and george's loitering around the paddy wagon was not directly infringing on this policeman's ability to do so? We don't know... all we get is george's bias waffle.
Perhaps what annoys me most about georges journal is the fact that he tries to sound so smart. His stories could be narrowed down to a concise sentence or two. Instead george tries to tell us every aspect of his social life - his going out and partying, having SOOOOO many friends, never being alone etc etc when the true purpose of the story was supposedly to tell us why he hates cops. What was supposed to be the central focus of george's posts are thrown into the periphery (a good example of my point was georges post on his New Years Eve... oh i was so drunk blah blah blah, found myself in a room with some semi naked girl gibber jabber - He alludes to the fact that he might have had sex with this poor girl but is too humble or some shit to just say it's highly likely that i had sex with that girl). But he probably didn't. If you want to tell us how much you rule george just say "I am god's gift to the world" every post and be done with it, but just don't try and hide your narcissism in a haze of intelligent and yet poorly placed words.
Thankyou for your comments Karl, i'm sorry that you do not like any of my entries but i appreciate that you took the time to read them. In case it was not clear, i in no way meant to suggest that i engaged in any sort of sexual act with the mysterious lady on new year's eve, just that it was an unusual situation. Furthermore, i must agree with you that some pieces could be more logically set out and would be if i had the time. Karl, if you have a livejournal yourself i would love for you to direct me to it. If not, thankyou anyway for your criticisms and i'm sorry if i have offended you in any way.
This is Jacob, I'm george's friend who had the conversation with him on msn (the conversation which has apparently caused much heated discussion).
I'd like to start off by thanking Carl to some extent for backing me up with my views contained in the msn conversation. I'd also like to throw my own hat in the ring (in my own defense) and say that the snippet of conversation we see in George's live-journal has been doctored severely (George you totalitarian pig!)...
That being said however I'd also like to make the following points. 1) George is a top bloke, he's been very supportive of me and is a truly decent human being and excellent friend 2) Carl have you gone mental?
Ok fair enough some of George's entries might be a little hairy but there's no need to flip your lid over it, for starters this is a very personal thing a live-journal, George has exposed his thoughts, impressions, observations, some secrets and has put himself out there for us to view. There is no need to abuse him for this! To be honest in the greater scheme of things there is much more to life and the person that is George than this web-based diary. Surely you would agree Carl that it would be quite difficult to put a great amount of quantity and qualitative work into this small diary... surely you could understand that George has to leave certain details out, I'm sure he doesn't spend all his spare time thinking out a philosophy of each and every day that he experiences. He finds anecdotal qualities in occurrences in his life and puts them on here for us to enjoy, you miss George's point I'm sure, if you look into it too seriously.
I'd like to put a question to you Carl... why did you seriously go to all the effort of apparently burdening yourself by reading every single one of George's posts just so you could be confident of the crass you threw at him? Tisk tisk my man can't we all just get along? But yeah George is right Carl, do you have a live-journal that you'd like everyone to have a look at? If not, then I wonder why?
Also, to clear things up, I noticed Carl got quite offended by George's New Years Eve story. Carl I am certain George only meant this to be interpreted as "an unusual situation" nothing more nothing less as I know for a fact that George is asexual.... and he has no desire for physical pleasure because he is a eunuch
Jacob
P.S - Carl pull your head out your arse man, this isn't George's published autobiography - this is a web-based diary
"No, we are no more enemies than we were before. Like i say: he's like this ALL THE TIME. I think the rest of the conversation went pretty much like this.... Jacob-Well, i'm off to watch charmed, bye.... George:Yeh Peach Out i'll call you about our jam tomorry. I might add at this point that he never answered his phone about the jam! The reason i posted this is because i know that i am right because everybody know what you mean when you say "everything you say is unoriginal". To get bogged down in semantics the way he does is just unconstructive and detrimental to MAINSTREAM society."
Surely, from this reply alone everyone can see how full of shit George is. If I were you, I would assess your friendship with this clown... because it seems to me he would not appreciate anyone (let alone his “friends”). He sounds to me like a pompous, arrogant, self-interested belligerent arsehole.
Anyway the point is: George is COMPLETELY wrong! We sure as hell do not have a language without semantics (and we certainly need to acknowledge that to say something is not the same as thinking something). And I don't get what he meant by "...to get bogged down in semantics the way he does is just unconstructive and detrimental to MAINSTREAM society " What is that supposed to mean? Mainstream society? I doubt George himself even knows what he meant by that comment. It is constructive to point out that george is a fraud. How the hell the it is “detrimental” to “mainstream society” I will never understand.
I mean come on people... is it not so painfully clear the guy has no clue what he's talking about, but tries so very hard to seem as though he does.
Thankyou once again for commenting on this journal. I have a couple of questions for you. 1. What exactly did you hope to acheive by commenting here? Ever since you arrived you've described me as pompous, arrogant and full of shit, but you still stick around to read and reply to my posts. You seem to be a smart guy, Karl, perhaps instead of criticising my journal, you could start one of your own and lead by example. Did you think that commenting here would cause me to change my way of life? Did you think I would say something along the lines of "Oh god, Karl B has challenged my way of thinking! Now i will devote my life to helping my fellow man"? I mean what the fuck dude? You rock up at my livejournal (which you're entirely welcome to do, it's not friends only) and start going on about how much of a clown you think i am, and yet you provide know information about yourself or that guy that bought you the shiny soapbox upon which you stand. Who the fuck are you Karl? The good-taste police? If you don't want to read my journal, don't. Go read one of those sophisticated, thought-provoking, logically structured journals you like so much and forget you ever came here. Alternatively, i suppose you could trawl the internet forever picking on random guys' journals.
I've read a fair few live-journals in my time, and I've noticed some people express interesting, informative and logically set out pieces... yours, I'm afraid to say is not one of those.
I've read the majority of your entries before making this post (just to confirm my points) and it is now clear to me your entries are full of shit. They are pointless babble and do not make the least bit of sense.
For example, in this your most recent post... your friend is 100% right, everything said verbally is completely unique and original, and furthermore he is correct in his assertion that what someone says is by no means necessarily what they think, for example LIES!! Which your "journal" is filled with.
I'd like to draw everyone's attention to the previous entry before this one (re: george's hatred of police). Your article had very little to do with police!! I mean look how big that post was, and its only at the very end we learn briefly about george's absurd conclusions as to why he hates police. First of all it would be very safe to say that george has probably only seen (not even dealt with!) 0.01% of the world's police. Secondly, how do we know this giant policeman that george claims was apparently the devil in earthly form was not indeed attempting to drive george's hoodlum associates to jail where they belong and george's loitering around the paddy wagon was not directly infringing on this policeman's ability to do so? We don't know... all we get is george's bias waffle.
Perhaps what annoys me most about georges journal is the fact that he tries to sound so smart. His stories could be narrowed down to a concise sentence or two. Instead george tries to tell us every aspect of his social life - his going out and partying, having SOOOOO many friends, never being alone etc etc when the true purpose of the story was supposedly to tell us why he hates cops. What was supposed to be the central focus of george's posts are thrown into the periphery (a good example of my point was georges post on his New Years Eve... oh i was so drunk blah blah blah, found myself in a room with some semi naked girl gibber jabber - He alludes to the fact that he might have had sex with this poor girl but is too humble or some shit to just say it's highly likely that i had sex with that girl). But he probably didn't.
If you want to tell us how much you rule george just say "I am god's gift to the world" every post and be done with it, but just don't try and hide your narcissism in a haze of intelligent and yet poorly placed words.
- Karl B
Reply
Karl, if you have a livejournal yourself i would love for you to direct me to it. If not, thankyou anyway for your criticisms and i'm sorry if i have offended you in any way.
Peach Out.
Reply
This is Jacob, I'm george's friend who had the conversation with him on msn (the conversation which has apparently caused much heated discussion).
I'd like to start off by thanking Carl to some extent for backing me up with my views contained in the msn conversation. I'd also like to throw my own hat in the ring (in my own defense) and say that the snippet of conversation we see in George's live-journal has been doctored severely (George you totalitarian pig!)...
That being said however I'd also like to make the following points.
1) George is a top bloke, he's been very supportive of me and is a truly decent human being and excellent friend
2) Carl have you gone mental?
Ok fair enough some of George's entries might be a little hairy but there's no need to flip your lid over it, for starters this is a very personal thing a live-journal, George has exposed his thoughts, impressions, observations, some secrets and has put himself out there for us to view. There is no need to abuse him for this! To be honest in the greater scheme of things there is much more to life and the person that is George than this web-based diary.
Surely you would agree Carl that it would be quite difficult to put a great amount of quantity and qualitative work into this small diary... surely you could understand that George has to leave certain details out, I'm sure he doesn't spend all his spare time thinking out a philosophy of each and every day that he experiences. He finds anecdotal qualities in occurrences in his life and puts them on here for us to enjoy, you miss George's point I'm sure, if you look into it too seriously.
I'd like to put a question to you Carl... why did you seriously go to all the effort of apparently burdening yourself by reading every single one of George's posts just so you could be confident of the crass you threw at him? Tisk tisk my man can't we all just get along? But yeah George is right Carl, do you have a live-journal that you'd like everyone to have a look at? If not, then I wonder why?
Also, to clear things up, I noticed Carl got quite offended by George's New Years Eve story. Carl I am certain George only meant this to be interpreted as "an unusual situation" nothing more nothing less as I know for a fact that George is asexual.... and he has no desire for physical pleasure because he is a eunuch
Jacob
P.S - Carl pull your head out your arse man, this isn't George's published autobiography - this is a web-based diary
Reply
"No, we are no more enemies than we were before. Like i say: he's like this ALL THE TIME. I think the rest of the conversation went pretty much like this.... Jacob-Well, i'm off to watch charmed, bye.... George:Yeh Peach Out i'll call you about our jam tomorry. I might add at this point that he never answered his phone about the jam!
The reason i posted this is because i know that i am right because everybody know what you mean when you say "everything you say is unoriginal". To get bogged down in semantics the way he does is just unconstructive and detrimental to MAINSTREAM society."
Surely, from this reply alone everyone can see how full of shit George is. If I were you, I would assess your friendship with this clown... because it seems to me he would not appreciate anyone (let alone his “friends”). He sounds to me like a pompous, arrogant, self-interested belligerent arsehole.
Anyway the point is:
George is COMPLETELY wrong! We sure as hell do not have a language without semantics (and we certainly need to acknowledge that to say something is not the same as thinking something). And I don't get what he meant by "...to get bogged down in semantics the way he does is just unconstructive and detrimental to MAINSTREAM society " What is that supposed to mean? Mainstream society? I doubt George himself even knows what he meant by that comment. It is constructive to point out that george is a fraud. How the hell the it is “detrimental” to “mainstream society” I will never understand.
I mean come on people... is it not so painfully clear the guy has no clue what he's talking about, but tries so very hard to seem as though he does.
And no I do not have a live-journal.
Reply
Thankyou once again for commenting on this journal. I have a couple of questions for you.
1. What exactly did you hope to acheive by commenting here? Ever since you arrived you've described me as pompous, arrogant and full of shit, but you still stick around to read and reply to my posts. You seem to be a smart guy, Karl, perhaps instead of criticising my journal, you could start one of your own and lead by example. Did you think that commenting here would cause me to change my way of life? Did you think I would say something along the lines of "Oh god, Karl B has challenged my way of thinking! Now i will devote my life to helping my fellow man"? I mean what the fuck dude? You rock up at my livejournal (which you're entirely welcome to do, it's not friends only) and start going on about how much of a clown you think i am, and yet you provide know information about yourself or that guy that bought you the shiny soapbox upon which you stand. Who the fuck are you Karl? The good-taste police? If you don't want to read my journal, don't. Go read one of those sophisticated, thought-provoking, logically structured journals you like so much and forget you ever came here. Alternatively, i suppose you could trawl the internet forever picking on random guys' journals.
Peach Out
Reply
Jacob
Reply
Leave a comment