(no subject)
Oh, the bile. This man can hardly breathe, the hate is so hard:
Oh Canada; you once again help prove my theory that women are batshit psycho hose beasts. Well, at least the ones that don’t take their husband’s last name and either just greedily keep their own or put in the ever pretentious hyphen.
Recently, this nutjob called Kathy Witterick, and her “husband” David Stocker had a child whom they called Storm. Yes, Storm, just like the X-Man.
....
This whole deal, to the parents (and parents, I mean mom. Nobody with a man card would fall for this bullshit) is that they’re trying to liberate their children from the constraints of gender.
Source
Compare and contrast to this individual:
If we strip marriage of the asymmetry of power, as we must if we allow men to marry men and women to marry women, then we also strip away the man and wife, dominant and submissive, owner and owned, master and servant relationship that characterizes the conservative view of marriage. This is what they want to preserve, and this is what they are talking about when people like Gingrich echo those tired phrases about “Judeo-Christian values” and complain that their “civilization is under attack”. And it is, when we challenge their right to treat one partner, so-called, as chattel.
And once you look at it that way, you see no abuse of their values when Gingrich goes tomcatting around-he’s simply asserting his traditional privilege as the Man.
Source
I know which one I want as a neighbor. How about you?
Oh Canada; you once again help prove my theory that women are batshit psycho hose beasts. Well, at least the ones that don’t take their husband’s last name and either just greedily keep their own or put in the ever pretentious hyphen.
Recently, this nutjob called Kathy Witterick, and her “husband” David Stocker had a child whom they called Storm. Yes, Storm, just like the X-Man.
....
This whole deal, to the parents (and parents, I mean mom. Nobody with a man card would fall for this bullshit) is that they’re trying to liberate their children from the constraints of gender.
Source
Compare and contrast to this individual:
If we strip marriage of the asymmetry of power, as we must if we allow men to marry men and women to marry women, then we also strip away the man and wife, dominant and submissive, owner and owned, master and servant relationship that characterizes the conservative view of marriage. This is what they want to preserve, and this is what they are talking about when people like Gingrich echo those tired phrases about “Judeo-Christian values” and complain that their “civilization is under attack”. And it is, when we challenge their right to treat one partner, so-called, as chattel.
And once you look at it that way, you see no abuse of their values when Gingrich goes tomcatting around-he’s simply asserting his traditional privilege as the Man.
Source
I know which one I want as a neighbor. How about you?