Saver' Character Development Weak? Savers' Main Characters Is One Dimensional?
So yeah, i'm arguing about the world's unfairness to Savers in a forum (blaming everything they don't like to Savers, even if it's not Savers' fault). And blahblahblah, those blamer ended up to bring things such as weak character development Savers has, Masaru-tachi being one dimensional, poor characterization, etc.They even said that Savers is the worst compared to all of its prequel on those subject.
I personally don't care things like that, what i enjoy from Savers (or even Digimon) isn't that kind of thing but the fight, the music, NEW ARTSTYLE, the Digimon, the plot, Masaru, the humor, etc. I believe that not every artwork regarding story need all those 3 to be considered good, there's plenty of other reason why some artwork is considered good or why someone like something.
IMHO, all of those 3 things are just a matter of opinion, since it depend from a person's point of view. I've seen some people's what have to said about Savers' CharDev, some said it's good, some said it's standard, most said it's bad. One even said only Ikuto and Falcomon that has been developed, of course that's coming from one who hated Savers to death (Machinistmon, if any of you remember him from wtw). One even disagree that when almost all people think that Gaomon's characterization is just a mindless robot, she thinks that Gaomon isn't like that. With those example, i can say that characterization and character development is just like opinion, it differ between people to people and it depend on a person's point of view.
So finally to the point, do you think Savers has weak CharDev compared to Adventure, 02, Tamers and Frontier? Do you think Savers has weak characterization?Do you think Masaru-tachi is one dimensional? How would you describe them all?
I personally don't care things like that, what i enjoy from Savers (or even Digimon) isn't that kind of thing but the fight, the music, NEW ARTSTYLE, the Digimon, the plot, Masaru, the humor, etc. I believe that not every artwork regarding story need all those 3 to be considered good, there's plenty of other reason why some artwork is considered good or why someone like something.
IMHO, all of those 3 things are just a matter of opinion, since it depend from a person's point of view. I've seen some people's what have to said about Savers' CharDev, some said it's good, some said it's standard, most said it's bad. One even said only Ikuto and Falcomon that has been developed, of course that's coming from one who hated Savers to death (Machinistmon, if any of you remember him from wtw). One even disagree that when almost all people think that Gaomon's characterization is just a mindless robot, she thinks that Gaomon isn't like that. With those example, i can say that characterization and character development is just like opinion, it differ between people to people and it depend on a person's point of view.
So finally to the point, do you think Savers has weak CharDev compared to Adventure, 02, Tamers and Frontier? Do you think Savers has weak characterization?Do you think Masaru-tachi is one dimensional? How would you describe them all?