And then there are hot girls in NO panties --
http://www.flickr.com/photos/30847262@N05/3979378176/in/pool-1512464@N25 PW 49 (one of those "double-dare you!" shots)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48524354@N07/5048243213/in/pool-1512464@N25 PW 48 (pretty girl nude at the beach -- what's not to like?)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nuvola_rossa/5195022549/in/pool-1512464@N25 PW 48 (ah, the satin-gloves/no-panties shot!)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28175993@N04/5225224517/in/contacts/ PW 50 (another perfect derriere, this time in very sheer panty-hose)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/29803215@N08/4987759900/ PW 50 (the title is Italian, "modest, but not overly so" -- pudica ma non troppo!)
NB I previously used the word "sluts" deliberately, connoting them being oblivious to their hot photos being unbloggable --as I replied to my delicious friend** who asked about derogatorily referring to girls as "sluts" --
http://devifemme.livejournal.com/926705.html ________________________
* today said to mean "without panties," but the dictionary gives the history -- "a [French] revolutionary: [it was] term of contempt applied by the aristocrats to the republicans of the poorly clad French Revolutionary army, who substituted pantaloons for knee breeches..."
** She, coincidentally, has a recent erotic story in which she refers to herself, “You like that, you little slut?" --
http://ready2please.livejournal.com/100299.html#cutid1 -- BUT see her concerned comments below, which led me to revise this post