BDSM for prudes -- "restrained restraint"

Jul 23, 2015 10:05

http://ultradevi.tumblr.com/post/124834746227/kneelbegcrawl-this-is-actually-one-of-mine-from

First, I must disavow this caption (the computer does them -- honest!); it's NOT "one of mine" -- it's from the evocatively named "kneelbegcrawl"...

Next, I gotta explain my "subject" line: you'll have noticed this chained-up girl named Daisy is in her swimsuit -- a rare case of "restrained restraint" -- most dominants (male and female) would have ripped off her clothes, and quite possibly her undies as well. And perhaps even played with certain...um, orifices.

No, I'm NOT criticizing ripping off a model's clothes! (Where would Tumblr be if it weren't for lack of impulse control?!) Damn, I love me a naked chick being "forced" into sub-space. (Note the quote marks, please; we've talked here about consensual non-consent [versus rape], and I trust we all know the difference.)

But I'm amused that some people get off by NOT getting off!

****************************

Just ANOTHER word about my "old tags" game here: I'm amused that my very-erotic list of hundreds of years-old tags actually yielded four suitably prudish tags: bondage, not nude, not topless, and bare shoulder. (Note the "not's"...) I venture to say one seldom sees "bondage" and "not nude" together.

Although, come to think of it, some bondage sites DO have a few shots of fully dressed girls; fuck, I've usually skipped right past them. Heck, I've even seen a number of uncomfortable-looking girls in handcuffs or wearing ball-gags -- actually, in THIS shot, the bikini-clad model is sporting one! -- whilst being (in)appropriately attired.

bare shoulder, not nude, not topless, bondage

Previous post Next post
Up