Sooooo, um... can I get a trifle indiscreet? (As if I weren't pretty darned untamed most of the time here, anyhow) The more alert readers will have seen (though -- aw! -- not commented on) my post about a silly "rant" back on Tuesday --
http://devifemme.livejournal.com/1473887.html. The whole conversation took place in the course of some naughty sex-bloggery* in recent weeks.
The offending comment was based on my mistakenly** thinking that my amorous friend F had somehow deleted my rant to her. In that bitchy scribble, I turned my usual persona of sexual submissive into that of a dominatrix. (I'm a "switch" on rare occasions; this was one such whip-wielding moment.)
She WAS amused by my effrontery (what a lovely under-used word!), but as a self-respecting domme she reminded me that subbies DO NOT question the actions of the women who "own" them. Sooo, long story short(er), I apologized to her AND I lavishly revised the Tuesday post -- which I humbly think is now pretty damned cute. So, my sexually curious readers (that's ALL of you, isn't it?), do please have ANOTHER look at
http://devifemme.livejournal.com/1473887.html (And, if you're even a bit turned on, please comment this time...)
________________________________
* Some of which has been here on the blog, which you sweet readers know is "open" (not "friends-only," as practised by many LJers concerned about on-line discretion). But it's a good moment, I think, for me to recommit to respect the privacy requested by those blogs -- as I've always done. Ironically, the LJ of my salacious friend F is friends-only, but she knowingly posted frank comments quite extensively here.
** F's charming habit of making naughty comments on long-ago posts confused me: I thought my reply to her (the rant itself) came in the main series --
http://devifemme.livejournal.com/1467002.html#comments (starting back on Feb. 26). Instead, it landed in an even earlier series -- in effect, "disappearing" for a while.