Emma Watson (ex Harry Potter-on this icon she's that little girl in part 1-HP and The Sorceres Stone)..she's really beautiful if you'll check her present photos :)
this is a second photo that looks like "underwater taken"
Though I haven't seen most of the Potter series (there's the horrid word again!), I did see Part 1 of Deathly Hallows -- understanding almost nothing of it. (Despite accompanying several young relatives of mine, who tried to explain mysterious parts...then being embarrassed by Bellatrix having her sexual way with Hermione [her screams were terrible] -- though the kids seemed perfectly comfortable with it.)
I do recall Hermione as quite erotic, especially her delicious moping around after being ravaged by Bellatrix. And, yes, I have seen her present photos -- woohoo!
lol!! I'm sure both-Bella and Hermione would be delighted :D :D In fact you somehow can't understand the story when you watch the last part.I didn't like the first book,though I liked the first movie..I was "manipulated" in,cause Petra's first son Peter desperately wanted to see it in the cinema and she was depressed to go without me.And then there was no way out,lol..Now I think through the 8 movies my bound with Peter grew a bit tighter according to his unbearable(for me and Petra,of course-HE was OK with it,lol) teenage years.Now-mostly when he realizes we want to go for movies,he wants to join..hard to trick him out.But flattering,cause-show me a 18 young eyecandy who wants to go in the movies with his mother and "aunt"!!
My young relatives live way out in Phoenix, Arizona, so I don't go to many movies with them. But I was shocked at how blase they were about the "torture" (evidently quite sexual) of Hermione; one 14-year-old said it was "more explicit in the book!"
You're writing about a boy who is "eyecandy;" to me it's a funny notion about males being candy, too -- though I googled the term, and -- you're correct -- about a third of the photos were of hot guys...
yes...mostly the book is better than the movie :)For me the HP series from 4-7th book were the most dark..when you see the story of a (though fictive) little boy who has to face the evil and fight against it is not much fun..esp.in the book 4 where he's tortured physicaly for the first time,not to speak of the fact he¨s a victim of his schoolmate's death,I don't hink the books are really for little kids..
for me-though I'm not bisexual- there are many I'd call "eyecandies",no matter if girls or boys :) It¨s not about sex,but some kind of beauty that no one can deny :) I don't mind to draw my Arno's attention to another woman's breasts when they really are beautiful...well,the fact he's living with me doesn't make him blind..and I know my sweetheart is somehow focused "upwards" .The first time I did,he was pretty confused,lol :) he thought it was a kind of a proof.
I liked your comment about drawing Arno's "attention" to pretty girls. When Joanne does that for me, I KNOW it's a "reproof" -- not the kindly gesture you make for him.
As for HP, from what little I know about the books, I agree they're not for younger children. As a lesbian, I resented their salaciously presenting sex between women as extremely deviant. I took a certain satisfaction from Hermione being shown moping around after what seemed to be torture -- as if being returned to the company of immature guys was a come-down after the (admittedly excessive) homosexual thrills of the night before.
Actually, I quite liked that formulation, "being returned to the company of immature guys." I mean, Harry and his goofy-looking friend never struck me as socially adept...
Thanks. Now I think of it -- friend was Ron Weasley, I think. But, actually, after the torture scenes, it was just Hermione and Harry, off in that bleak landscape. She looked lovely -- a study in feminine moods. And no Ron...but also no sex!
you really make me laugh :) I would like to know what you would think of my very favourite figure-prof.Snape,I think he's a real tease for a freudlike analysis :D :D
Thanks! I love to find humor in all sorts of situations -- oh, BTW did you like my silliness regarding Brigid's photo of the cars in the snow? (Might not be easy to understand how I chanced to find her Porsche mistake -- for car-nuts like me, it's pure "vive la diference!" For you, maybe, car-brands are not so obvious as a source of humor
( ... )
*points on her icon* I think Alan Rickman is 10000% perfect for Snape :) He captured him well..speaking of JKR-I really hate what she did to that figure..she left him to die as a stray dog with no glimpse of hope ..but I say that cause I've read the books and know all movies..AR made the figure very alive I must say.He's one of my very favourite actors and he's known to make all of his characters a bit "mad".I've missed it in "Dark Harbor" and truly enjoyed it in "Dogma" :)
I love to find humour..though sometimes I have a bit problems with my US flisters,cause-well,you live in a quite different world-I don't mean the language only,but the whole environment .Not to speak of the fact that I'm a country-girl.I'm using the technic cause it helps me to do things or to get things and events and makes my life easier in many ways..but I always prefer "walking trees" to "walking robots" if you know what I mean.So there are themes when I'm "in" and themes where you'll miss that "click" from me :D
I just replied to several other comments from you regarding humor (yours AND mine) in blogging. You ARE right that the "click" sometimes escapes us when seeking to comprehend "across" languages and milieus. But that IS the charm of "playing" in a foreign language.
When I was in Germany, there was a classic old humor magazine (Simplicissimus) I tried to understand -- I only "got" a third of it! But the parts I did comprehend were great. (I remember an antique illustration of a huge sailing ship being transferred on elaborate railroad tracks -- some sort of proposal to cross an isthmus, I think -- and an onlooker saying, " Als Mensch kann Ich das verstehen. Aber als Seemensch..."
Reply
And then there is the cold-warm shot from Jason, and you're right again...very good analysis of WHY the photo works...
Reply
this is a second photo that looks like "underwater taken"
Reply
I do recall Hermione as quite erotic, especially her delicious moping around after being ravaged by Bellatrix. And, yes, I have seen her present photos -- woohoo!
Hugz, J
Reply
In fact you somehow can't understand the story when you watch the last part.I didn't like the first book,though I liked the first movie..I was "manipulated" in,cause Petra's first son Peter desperately wanted to see it in the cinema and she was depressed to go without me.And then there was no way out,lol..Now I think through the 8 movies my bound with Peter grew a bit tighter according to his unbearable(for me and Petra,of course-HE was OK with it,lol) teenage years.Now-mostly when he realizes we want to go for movies,he wants to join..hard to trick him out.But flattering,cause-show me a 18 young eyecandy who wants to go in the movies with his mother and "aunt"!!
Reply
You're writing about a boy who is "eyecandy;" to me it's a funny notion about males being candy, too -- though I googled the term, and -- you're correct -- about a third of the photos were of hot guys...
Kisses, J
Reply
for me-though I'm not bisexual- there are many I'd call "eyecandies",no matter if girls or boys :) It¨s not about sex,but some kind of beauty that no one can deny :) I don't mind to draw my Arno's attention to another woman's breasts when they really are beautiful...well,the fact he's living with me doesn't make him blind..and I know my sweetheart is somehow focused "upwards" .The first time I did,he was pretty confused,lol :) he thought it was a kind of a proof.
Reply
As for HP, from what little I know about the books, I agree they're not for younger children. As a lesbian, I resented their salaciously presenting sex between women as extremely deviant. I took a certain satisfaction from Hermione being shown moping around after what seemed to be torture -- as if being returned to the company of immature guys was a come-down after the (admittedly excessive) homosexual thrills of the night before.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I love to find humour..though sometimes I have a bit problems with my US flisters,cause-well,you live in a quite different world-I don't mean the language only,but the whole environment .Not to speak of the fact that I'm a country-girl.I'm using the technic cause it helps me to do things or to get things and events and makes my life easier in many ways..but I always prefer "walking trees" to "walking robots" if you know what I mean.So there are themes when I'm "in" and themes where you'll miss that "click" from me :D
Reply
When I was in Germany, there was a classic old humor magazine (Simplicissimus) I tried to understand -- I only "got" a third of it! But the parts I did comprehend were great. (I remember an antique illustration of a huge sailing ship being transferred on elaborate railroad tracks -- some sort of proposal to cross an isthmus, I think -- and an onlooker saying, " Als Mensch kann Ich das verstehen. Aber als Seemensch..."
BTW Loved Rickman in Dogma!! Great film!
Reply
Leave a comment