on language

Jan 08, 2009 13:19

a really fun Q & A with the editor of the oxford english dictionary and ta-nehisi coates about what criterion counts when deciding what is and is not a word.TNC: What fuels the notion that certain words aren't really words?

JS: People feel that there is a certain kind of language that's appropriate and a certain type that isn't appropriate. And these judgments are based on many things--some may make sense, some might not. People take these things very seriously. People are told things about the language in school that are demonstrably untrue, and they think anyone who doesn't follow along with those beliefs is stupid or wrong.

Let me give you an example, in terms of looking at things historically. At the beginning of this conversation you pronounced the word "ask" as "aks." This is something that people often object to. People say it's the wrong pronunciation, and it's stupid. But if you look at the history of the English language, you can't tell if the correct pronunciation is "aks" or "ask." The "aks" pronunciation goes back 1000 years. It's in Beowulf. It's in Chaucer.

What happened was both were in use. But at some point, the dialect in which the "ask" pronunciation was used became dominant. But both continued and have been in use since then. When you look at America, the "aks" pronunciation is widespread in Southern American English. African-Americans used this because they were in the South--it's not especially African-American, but its Southern.
read the whole thing. it's a hoot. i totally want to have lunch with the guy from the OED, Jesse Sheidlower. he seems unassailably cool. in a completely geeky way, of course. but it seems smart yet unpretentious seems to be totally in right now. sweet.

daily grind

Previous post Next post
Up