A fascinating drama will be playing out over the next few months as the latest claims of a new inexpensive energy source are tested in the marketplace.
You may recall that the original claims of "cold-fusion" by Pons and Fleishman in 1989 were roundly discounted and condemned to the same trash heap as perpetual motion machines. Condemnation was
(
Read more... )
Comments 2
Side question: on wind power, how many birds do these things actually kill, relative to (say) domestic housecats and glass windows? I understand the aesthetic objections, but I suspect that people will come to like how windmills look once they're used to them (sound might be more of an issue), so overall it seems a reasonable option.
Reply
I think the number of birds killed is less important than the types (which include raptors large enough to eat cats). Hawks, falcons and eagles favor windy hilltops where they can find lift, which is also where windmills work best. This is an important issue because it has already slowed the adoption of wind power, which is otherwise mature enough to survive without subsidies.
The mainstream media were burned by the original cold-fusion debacle and will be very slow to embrace any resurgence of similar technology. Nobody likes to look gullible (me included). There is so much hype and emotion surrounding this field that it is hard to know what to believe.
Reply
Leave a comment