(Untitled)

[der_gewinner]

Achtung! I would like to register my disappointment in the LA Times. The front page of tonight's edition covers the trial of Shadi Enigmar (a.k.a. Zak Gramarye), as well it should. I take umbrage, however, with the focus of the article. “Phoenix the Forger? LA's Legend Implicated in Fraud.” Tell me, why should we glorify the crimes of this

Comments

[knights_edge]

Page two. "Genius Prosecutor Reveals Crooked Attorney."

[der_gewinner]

It is something, at least.

Still, you've got to admit there is some discrepancy in hiding that article on page two, after covering the front with mixed reviews of the villain in our story, ja?

[knights_edge]

Discrepancy? Phoenix Wright means a lot more to this city than a rookie prosecutor still wet behind the ears. There is your cause of imbalanced reporting.

1/2

[der_gewinner]

...When you put it that way.

[der_gewinner]

Herr Edgeworth, can you see the embedded video on your side?

[knights_edge]

No, not at all.

[der_gewinner]

...Damn.

[knights_edge]

And the drinking age here is still 21.

[der_gewinner]

...Scheißt.

Back home I go, then. I'm a law-abiding man.