LOLOL

Feb 07, 2011 20:11

ep notes

Leave a comment

Comments 19

blackmare February 8 2011, 01:12:34 UTC
I thought of that, too, but obviously it isn't, since she had these symptoms for a long time before she met House.

I'm hoping we do get to see some Wilson in this episode, though. It isn't looking promising that way, so far.

Reply

deelaundry February 8 2011, 01:15:01 UTC
There's no Wilson at all in this ep, according to a reliable source from HHOW. I'm now down to hoping there will be an explanation why Wilson is not there.

I won't be watching the ep until after the Littlest Laundry goes to bed -- but I am fine with being spoiled.

Reply

blackmare February 8 2011, 01:22:21 UTC
Oh, I just don't even see the point of doing a House episode without Wilson, but I've resigned myself to the fact that we get at least one each season.

*sigh*

Otherwise it's good so far, though.

Reply

m_supercomputer February 8 2011, 03:57:24 UTC
Actually, this is only the 2nd episode so far, I believe, unless one counts the 2nd half of 'Broken' - 'Adverse Effects' was the only other one, and that was when RSL was on his honeymoon. There's one or two a season without H/W scenes, though, at least in most of them.

Reply


nightdog_barks February 8 2011, 01:34:14 UTC
HA, THAT WOULD BE MOST AWESOME!

I miss Wilson, but so far this is a good episode.

Reply

deelaundry February 8 2011, 03:21:18 UTC
It was a pretty good episode. House as Puzzle Solver always does it for me.

I liked the Internal Medicine doctor. It was interesting to hear from a peer of House's.

Reply


cuddyclothes February 8 2011, 02:09:12 UTC
Not bad. Except that I kept being distracted by the vanished Hugh Laurie upper eyelids and the fact that the hospital generators went out during the thunderstorm but no one seemed to notice.

ETA: Mr. L is da bomb.

ETA ETA: I won't mention the eyelids on that board. Promise.

Reply

deelaundry February 8 2011, 03:17:00 UTC
I thought the transition into the dark/washed-out lighting and then back again was too blatant, for sure.

Reply


namasteyoga February 8 2011, 02:14:04 UTC
At least the drugging of Mrs. Cuddy did play a part in the diagnostic process.

Reply

deelaundry February 8 2011, 03:17:44 UTC
True!

Reply


taiga13 February 8 2011, 02:43:32 UTC
I really want there to be consequences when House pulls that stunt one day, that someone does get sick or injured or die and House has to explain to the police "well yeah I drugged him/her. I do it all the time. It's part of my charm."
(But then I also keep waiting for Cuddy to realize that it's only a matter of time before he does it to Rachel.)

Reply

deelaundry February 8 2011, 03:15:54 UTC
He already has done it to Rachel. He drugged her to get her out of Cuddy's house and to the hospital (I think) in that "House and Wilson Toddler Hijinks" episode. Also, House was the one who got Wilson to give Rachel laxatives in hopes she'd poop out the dime.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up