Since it would be unethical for me to judge based on my personal opinion of US/Mexican immigration, and it would likewise be unethical for me to judge based on my projections of the given arguments (what I think could have been said), and because the burden of proof was in the court of
the__lord, my vote goes to
fireuzer. If, however,
the__lord had used the pronouns "they" and "their" instead of "us" and "our" in describing the US, then my vote would have gone to him for providing a good argument for the overall benefit to mankind, and not to fireuzer, who provided a good argument for the benefit of the US.