Let’s think about the Black Family Tree for a moment-not the data in the possibly non-canonical display of Phineas’s branch that was created by JKR for a charity auction, but the hanging itself, that Sirius showed off to Harry, with commentary. What does canon say, and what can we deduce, about the Black Family Tapestry?
It’s not a prepossessing
(
Read more... )
Comments 20
As much as culture changes from generation to generation, it has never made sense to me that somehow everyone in all the pureblood families who were sorted into Slytherin never had a culture change from the Dark Ages. OR even disagreements? It's just not realistic. That's why I love when people write histories of the Malfoy's were their such and such famous ancestor believed the opposite of what they did in the books, but was shunned for it in their society at the time just like the modern Malfoys are. Or when they have a famous one that was shunned for their progressiveness, BUT by HP's modern standards that one was just as racist. It just seems more true to life to me.
Reply
Because of course that long, tangled line of her ancestors were all Pure.... why else would the Tree have been created? And of course anyone unworthy would have been blasted off--if no one was, it's because in the Good Olde Days no family member behaved so badly as the youth of today....
If it was done around the time the Blacks purchased 12 Grimmauld Place, I think it was as part of a deliberate and conscious fraud.
And there may have been a number of families whitewashing their pasts sometime after the WW started Seclusion--rewriting family history so that not only were they magical back X years, but they were only-magical back that far.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
And yes, who starts a family tree by calling it "ancient" and then doesn't add any ancestors? If "ancient" were on the heading when the thing was new back in 1295 or whenever, there would be ancestors at least back to, oh, 1066 or so, if not earlier. So someone altered it, or it wasn't made until at least a century or two later. Or both.
Another curiosity, which we can't resolve given the alteration(s) over the years: where did they acquire the surname Black in the first place? Is it from the French blanc (and is that medieval Norman French or did they have a variant)? Or is it from an English branch of the ancestral tree? There's Old English blœc (black) and blac (pale) as possibilities, and even a guy named Wulfric the Black/Wulfrigus Niger ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
~*~
Isn't Blanc the French for "White", though?
Reply
Leave a comment