Author’s note: This essay offers a Watsonian explanation for certain things in the Potterverse. It ignores any Doylist explanations for those things, including Rowling’s.
In reply to my DH sporking, chapter 29, maidofkent wrote in part,
You're right that it seems pretty hypocritical to joke about Snape running away from shampoo, when the male
(
Read more... )
It should be further remembered that the connection between bathing and illness first became prominent in the 14th century. Prior to that, public bath houses had been quite common, however much the church might have disapproved. Hogwarts was supposedly founded in the 11th century, so the importance of bathing probably wouldn't have been a major divide between the wizards and Muggles.
It's easy to look back with 20-20 hindsight and sneer at our ancestors for being so ignorant, but that's merely an expression of arrogance, privilege, and complacency built on centuries of dedicated research and lost and ruined lives. Even the scientific method, a carefully structured guide to research designed to reduce errors, was something that had to be invented and is in fact extremely counter-intuitive to natural human thought processes. This is why budding scientists, and really all citizens, need to be trained in how to use it properly.
***
Interesting note on how Sev's environment growing up could have influenced his latter hygiene choices, assuming we believe our Brave Gryffindors were telling the unvarnished truth in their descriptions of the professor they disliked.
Reply
Reply
And (although it's not often remembered) public bathhouses were actually quite unhygienic. After all, the baths were all communal, and they didn't have any mechanisms yet for replacing water, so before long you'd essentially be wallowing in other people's filth. There's a reason why Galen advised that people with open wounds shouldn't go to the bathhouses.
Reply
Leave a comment