Leave a comment

oryx_leucoryx February 2 2014, 00:22:01 UTC
IOW she didn't listen to her characters. Not that I think Harry and Hermione would have been better. I think they should have ended up with 3 other people, probably ones they only met for the first time after the war was over. No baggage.

Reply

ladyzenobia February 2 2014, 00:26:35 UTC
Yeah, I never got relationship vibes from any of them either and I'm generally not buying that everyone married their high school sweetheart and never met anyone else. But I still prefer Harry/Hermione only because Ron/Hermione reminds me so much of Molly and Arthur =S

Reply

oryx_leucoryx February 2 2014, 00:45:36 UTC
Yes, Rowling made them more and more Molly&Arthur as she went along. If anyone wants to know what Molly and Arthur were like as kids they have much of it in Ron and Hermione. She even gave both Molly and Hermione fall birthdays, and both Arthur and Ron spring birthdays. And I bet the older couple were also prefects, and Arthur confiscated other people's illegal toys so he could play with them.

Reply

ladyzenobia February 2 2014, 08:01:24 UTC
If they were muggle toys, certainly. And the worst thing is, that Rowling probably intended the comparison to be drawn, cause she actually thinks that Molly and Arthur are a great couple.

Reply

attilathepbnun February 2 2014, 00:39:27 UTC
I always thought so, too.
Another thing that bugs me is Ron just stepping into his dead brother's place like that. As if all Weasleys were interchangeable ...

Reply

ladyzenobia February 2 2014, 08:04:54 UTC
Well... they pretty much are to me =P (except Percy, bless him), but I get what you mean. The replacement-Fred storyline always looked so out of left field to me. Makes me wonder what she had planned for Ron that didn't make it into the books.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up