I forget, did Voldemort laugh while or after killing Lily? Because if so, maybe the AK would have damaged any spell surrounding the crib, since Lily was standing right in front of it. Then Harry could have heard the laugh at any point from the point Lily died up to when the curse rebounded.
Re: Curses, foiled again!danajsparksNovember 17 2011, 19:45:36 UTC
Hmmm, the sequence of sounds that Harry remembers hearing in PoA is different from what Voldemort remembers hearing. From chapter 12 of PoA: White fog obscured his senses… big, blurred shapes were moving around him… then came a new voice, a man’s voice, shouting, panicking -
“Lily, take Harry and go! It’s him! Go! Run! I’ll hold him off -”
The sounds of someone stumbling from a room - a door bursting open - a cackle of high- pitched laughter -
So the aural sequence is: Dad shouting. Stumble. Bang. Laughter....
I don't know how we account for the fact that James shouts before the door bursts open in PoA but afterwards in DH.
Re: Curses, foiled again!terri_testingNovember 18 2011, 04:19:25 UTC
It works if Harry's sequence is incomplete (which we already know it is)
and if Tom did laugh again within the room (or if that sound is Harry's confabulation of the Tom-fragment's feeling of maniacal glee at that point).
Dad shouts (heard). Stumbling out (Lily) ... blank for a bit, then the door bursting open and the laugh.
Actually, I did wonder if this entire "memory" was Harry's confabulation, a construction written to account for what he knew had happened, but it is a little too close to Tom's (if we take Tom's to be a whole and complete memory) for that explanation to be account for.
Re: Curses, foiled again!annoni_noNovember 18 2011, 10:31:57 UTC
Votes for the entire memory being confabulated by *Tom* from shredded fragments and then picked up through the mental link by Harry. We know that the link between the Horcrux and the original is still somehow "present" and active to varying degrees up through the final confrontation in DH. Voldie's body was shredded by the backfire, why can't we assume his soul, sanity, and memory were too, to some extent? The dementors then just pulled up the only fragments of genuine memory Tom had left of the incident through Harry, and Tommy-boy filled in the blanks later - after he'd taken a noticeable dive in mental competence./hates that flashback SO MUCH... and why did the *bleep* would he offer Harry a comforting lie about how well his father fought in PS instead of mocking Harry about how pathetic he remembered the twit being?
Consistent characterization? What consistent characterization?
Re: Curses, foiled again!oryx_leucoryxNovember 18 2011, 15:15:55 UTC
By the mirror Tom lied to Harry because he was trying to corrupt him. Tom's truest victory would have been Harry handing him the Stone voluntarily. Once Harry refused Tom resorted to the lesser victory of killing Harry who was still opposed to him. 1984.
Re: Curses, foiled again!annoni_noNovember 18 2011, 15:58:26 UTC
But how is *encouraging* Harry with tales of his parents' supposed bravery in any way conducive to that? Did Voldie somehow think he had time to build Harry up and then break him down again? He knew Harry was lying about having the Stone, presumably by legilimizing him, so why would he pursue such an obviously counterproductive course when he didn't even have the excuse of an obscured line of sight on Harry?
How would the chance to break Harry's spirit utterly by revealing the pathetic truth of his parents last stand not appeal to him more, especially when the end result was much more likely to be Harry giving him the Stone in despair, or at least not being able to resist his efforts in retrieving it. He was even on something of a deadline at the time since he couldn't be sure how long Dumbledore would be distracted! So, again, what purpose did that lie actually serve?
Re: Curses, foiled again!oryx_leucoryxNovember 18 2011, 16:46:26 UTC
Tom tried with claiming James died begging for his life - all he got was Harry's insistence that this wasn't so. So he tried the reverse tactic - your parents willingly sacrificed themselves for your life, clearly they'd want you to give up that silly stone so you'd live longer. To make this point he made James appear heroic to Harry. The only way the truth would have worked was if he could have made Harry actually see the scene so he'd know Tom was telling the truth.
A villain who tempts his enemies into doing his bidding is much creepier than one who uses brute force or even the direct threat of force.
Re: Curses, foiled again!annoni_noNovember 18 2011, 19:20:40 UTC
But the reverse tactic got pretty much the exact same response: defiance. He's also supposed to be one of the most talented Legilimens in the WW, so why is so clueless about how to get the reaction he's looking for? And again, he doesn't have unlimited time here like thought he did in the graveyard in GoF, so what is he actually trying to accomplish with this? It seems awfully half-hearted as a corruption attempt. It almost worked on the first read-through as an honest acknowledgement of a worthy opponent who truly did fight and die with enough skill to impress him, and maybe some regret that he hadn't been able recruit such an able fighter to his own forces, though I still thought something was missing. But given everything that we learned of Tom's character in the later books... I want to be convinced, but I just can't buy the 'corruption theory.' It just doesn't feel like Tom's style.
Reverse tacticterri_testingNovember 19 2011, 08:17:00 UTC
Except that there was something else going on in the background.
When Tom claimed, "They died begging me for mercy," Harry screamed, "LIAR!"
But when Tom switched to saying, "How touching.... I always value bravery... Yes, boy, your parents were brave...."
... then Harry switched to listening motionless, sopping up comforting tales of his parents' heroics. Real and remembered bitterly by Tom, confabulated, outright falsehoods, it doesn't matter for the analysis of how those tales worked on HARRY.
What matters is that Harry allowed the body saying such things to approach him physically without objection or notice. To get close enough to cut off Harry's possible phyaical escape. By the time Harry thought to make a run for the door, Quirrel!mort was close enough to intercept him.
Do you really think Harry was stupid enough to stand there listening to his mortal enemy insult his parents, while watching that same enemy position himself between Harry and the only door?
Re: Curses, foiled again!oryx_leucoryxNovember 18 2011, 22:36:12 UTC
So whose memories are we seeing where? Either the Tom of PS was telling the truth as he remembered it or he was deliberately saying something different from how he remembered events or he had no memory whatsoever of the events and was making things up as he went along
( ... )
Re: Curses, foiled again!annoni_noNovember 26 2011, 08:26:43 UTC
Well, my main issue with the scene in PS was that I *couldn't* come up with any motivation for Tom's actions that felt coherent given his later characterization. Everything I came up with felt "off" given some later event. As things stand now, I'm inclined to accept Terri's snake-charmer motivation presented above, not least because it presents a villain with basic competence
( ... )
Re: Curses, foiled again!danajsparksNovember 19 2011, 00:15:04 UTC
----Except, in DH, when Tom remembers the incident, the only time we're told he laughed out loud was immediately before killing James. How would Harry even hear that, especially if his mom had already started screaming?
Lily and Harry might not have even been all the way upstairs yet when Tom laughed. Even if they were already upstairs, the house wasn't especially large and Tom certainly wasn't trying to be quiet. His laughter could probably be heard from anywhere in the house. Also, Tom makes no observation about Lily screaming until after James is already dead.
Reply
Reply
Reply
“Lily, take Harry and go! It’s him! Go! Run! I’ll hold him off -”
The sounds of someone stumbling from a room - a door bursting open - a cackle of high- pitched laughter -
So the aural sequence is: Dad shouting. Stumble. Bang. Laughter....
I don't know how we account for the fact that James shouts before the door bursts open in PoA but afterwards in DH.
Reply
and if Tom did laugh again within the room (or if that sound is Harry's confabulation of the Tom-fragment's feeling of maniacal glee at that point).
Dad shouts (heard). Stumbling out (Lily) ... blank for a bit, then the door bursting open and the laugh.
Actually, I did wonder if this entire "memory" was Harry's confabulation, a construction written to account for what he knew had happened, but it is a little too close to Tom's (if we take Tom's to be a whole and complete memory) for that explanation to be account for.
Reply
Consistent characterization? What consistent characterization?
Reply
Reply
How would the chance to break Harry's spirit utterly by revealing the pathetic truth of his parents last stand not appeal to him more, especially when the end result was much more likely to be Harry giving him the Stone in despair, or at least not being able to resist his efforts in retrieving it. He was even on something of a deadline at the time since he couldn't be sure how long Dumbledore would be distracted! So, again, what purpose did that lie actually serve?
Reply
A villain who tempts his enemies into doing his bidding is much creepier than one who uses brute force or even the direct threat of force.
Reply
Reply
When Tom claimed, "They died begging me for mercy," Harry screamed, "LIAR!"
But when Tom switched to saying, "How touching.... I always value bravery... Yes, boy, your parents were brave...."
... then Harry switched to listening motionless, sopping up comforting tales of his parents' heroics. Real and remembered bitterly by Tom, confabulated, outright falsehoods, it doesn't matter for the analysis of how those tales worked on HARRY.
What matters is that Harry allowed the body saying such things to approach him physically without objection or notice. To get close enough to cut off Harry's possible phyaical escape. By the time Harry thought to make a run for the door, Quirrel!mort was close enough to intercept him.
Do you really think Harry was stupid enough to stand there listening to his mortal enemy insult his parents, while watching that same enemy position himself between Harry and the only door?
Really do you think that ( ... )
Reply
...Although the Harry-is-just-that-stupid theory runs a close second :p
Reply
Reply
Reply
Lily and Harry might not have even been all the way upstairs yet when Tom laughed. Even if they were already upstairs, the house wasn't especially large and Tom certainly wasn't trying to be quiet. His laughter could probably be heard from anywhere in the house. Also, Tom makes no observation about Lily screaming until after James is already dead.
Reply
Leave a comment