(Untitled)

Jan 09, 2009 01:48

Inquiry: the one known to me as 'Papa', when flustered, is 'cute'. Is this a fact or an unproven assumption? The source of this theory is 'Tifa', former designation 'Mama'.

Though there is knowledge, there is no comprehension. I do not understand the logic of this statement.

Explain?

not exactly what she meant, this child is bipolar wtfffff, unpredictable even by the mun, event

Leave a comment

Comments 92

young_earl January 9 2009, 14:46:31 UTC
You should think of it as an opinion.

Reply

dawndigger January 9 2009, 14:50:31 UTC
An opinion?

Reply

young_earl January 9 2009, 15:06:22 UTC
Yes. What someone thinks.

Reply

dawndigger January 9 2009, 15:24:13 UTC
It sounds too simple. Would that not be just an excuse to disagree with facts?

Reply


Shiva does not have a headdesk icon. herobydefault January 9 2009, 23:08:16 UTC
dawndigger January 9 2009, 23:26:34 UTC
[Watchin' u headdesk.]

Reply

herobydefault January 9 2009, 23:48:50 UTC
Somebody else already explained it to you, I see.

Reply

dawndigger January 10 2009, 00:11:21 UTC
Correct.

Are you flustered?

Reply


goldenpathredux January 10 2009, 03:26:47 UTC
You're not a...thinking machine, are you?

Reply

dawndigger January 10 2009, 03:33:41 UTC
No, I am not.

Reply


wise_maiden January 10 2009, 14:08:30 UTC
Simon?

... I hope they've explained it already.

Reply

dawndigger January 10 2009, 15:56:57 UTC
Yes. I have received an acceptable answer.

Reply

wise_maiden January 10 2009, 17:10:52 UTC
Good.

... Are you all right?

Reply

dawndigger January 10 2009, 17:16:28 UTC
My condition is acceptable. Your concern is not required at this time.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up