[locked from sakaki-dono] Chart 3.0

Jan 10, 2010 22:15

Very interesting. Very interesting indeed. I have finally come up with what I hope is the final another chart regarding relationships here at Lioncrest. Of course, things are always up for interpretation. As such, I am willing to make revisions ( Read more... )

kisarazu atsushi, sanada, conclusions, yanagi, yukimura, ii data, hitouji, atobe, akutsu, fuji yuuta, hirakoba, echizen, shishido, oishi, tachibana, kajimoto, zaizen, saeki, akutagawa, observations, marui, fuji syuusuke, oshitari yuushi, konjiki, kurobane, hiyoshi, kirihara, tezuka, kite, kikumaru, mizuki, amane, dan, niou, akazawa, mukahi, sengoku, oshitari kenya, yanagisawa, yagyuu, echizen ryoga, kabaji, kisarazu ryou, ohtori, shiraishi

Leave a comment

himitsunotsuki January 11 2010, 04:37:03 UTC
I've been looking forward to another of these but I'm afraid you're still not there yet.

Reply

dataempire January 11 2010, 04:42:15 UTC
I have to keep myself, Yuushi. For the sanctity of the data.

(ooc: ...his logic = fail)

Reply

himitsunotsuki January 11 2010, 04:44:37 UTC
But doesn't it rather remove you from important equations and confuse the matter further?

Reply

dataempire January 11 2010, 04:51:37 UTC
I... Er... No.

(ooc: wherein no actually means yes.)

Reply

himitsunotsuki January 11 2010, 04:53:10 UTC
The refusal in combination with that icon really makes me question your import.

Reply

dataempire January 11 2010, 05:00:10 UTC
If I include myself, that means that I manipulated my own experiment.

Reply

himitsunotsuki January 11 2010, 05:04:37 UTC
Not intentionally, and certainly not to ill effect, mm?

Reply

dataempire January 11 2010, 05:22:05 UTC
Well...no...

Reply

himitsunotsuki January 11 2010, 06:52:50 UTC
And since Shishido has gotten his point across quite well ^^ I must now point out that I do not in fact pine after Keigo.

Reply

awedprowess January 11 2010, 14:02:01 UTC
I was finding that the most convincing part of the chart, Yuushi.

Reply

himitsunotsuki January 11 2010, 19:06:50 UTC
Consider me mildly amused.

Reply

serving_u January 11 2010, 05:31:00 UTC
And he's definitely involved in his experiment. He totally needs to add himself to the lists. If we double team him I bet we can convince him.

Reply

dataempire January 11 2010, 05:47:16 UTC
That's just plain unnecessary.

(ooc: it won't take much convincing...)

Reply

serving_u January 11 2010, 05:49:18 UTC
Don't be lame. You're sleeping with me. I'm part of the whole Lioncrest study of relationship dynamics. Therefore, you're so totally involved too.

See, I even used all my fancy science learning and everything for that argument.

Reply

dataempire January 11 2010, 05:55:51 UTC
Damn it!

Yes... going to edit now.

Reply

serving_u January 11 2010, 05:58:25 UTC


Next time, just be less lame and put yourself on from the start. Saves me having to break out the logic.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up