so true
"i never vote. it only encourages them".
all those bring out the vote programs are so popular it makes me suspicious. for them to be popular, they must be beneficial to the system or else the programs would've been quietly suppressed and eliminated. so why do what they, the system, want you to do for their/its benefit? why follow along like sheep? i say fuck voting, next time there is a election, no one should vote, that'll show em...
and for the liberals in this country: with the winner takes all electoral college system, there is no hope anyway. there will always be more ignorant, gun-toting, anti-women's rights, bible-thumping neo conservatives in this country than the enlightened. so nothing is really lost.
speaking of women's rights, a woman has the right to choose whether to become a mother or not; ie whether to have the baby, and i am in full support of such rights. but why is it in so many cases, when the woman decides to have the evil mutant, the man is automatically dragged in along with the woman's decision. if he turns and walks away, ie decides that he, in fact, did not want to become a parent, he is shuned, ridiculed and looked upon as less a man for not stepping up in the least, and in many cases are dragged into court by the other party to be financially responsible? if women have the right to choose whether or not to become a parent, then the same right should apply to men. the man should be able to say i do not want to be involved and not be responsible if the woman chooses to have the mutant regardless. if women should have the right to choose without the consent of the men involved, then men should also have to right to choose without the women's consent. any logical women's right advocates should really be in support of such men's rights, anything less would be hypocritical. if men are to suppport women's right to choose, then men should have the same right to choose and have their decisions supported.
but then again, such hypocritical sentiment seems to permeate much of the pseudo-independent women's minds, the having the cake and eating it too mentality. yes, we want equal pay, but the men should still pay for the date; yes, we want sexal equality, but the men still need to make the first fucking move; we want equal treatment, but chivalry is so nice. every time i've spoken about chivalry as an anti-women's rights antiquated male chaunvinistic set of behavior in front of women, they always looked at me like i've just grown a third head and completely unfit for their company. think the argument through to its logical conclusion and wake the fuck up and smell your hypocrisy!
all those bring out the vote programs are so popular it makes me suspicious. for them to be popular, they must be beneficial to the system or else the programs would've been quietly suppressed and eliminated. so why do what they, the system, want you to do for their/its benefit? why follow along like sheep? i say fuck voting, next time there is a election, no one should vote, that'll show em...
and for the liberals in this country: with the winner takes all electoral college system, there is no hope anyway. there will always be more ignorant, gun-toting, anti-women's rights, bible-thumping neo conservatives in this country than the enlightened. so nothing is really lost.
speaking of women's rights, a woman has the right to choose whether to become a mother or not; ie whether to have the baby, and i am in full support of such rights. but why is it in so many cases, when the woman decides to have the evil mutant, the man is automatically dragged in along with the woman's decision. if he turns and walks away, ie decides that he, in fact, did not want to become a parent, he is shuned, ridiculed and looked upon as less a man for not stepping up in the least, and in many cases are dragged into court by the other party to be financially responsible? if women have the right to choose whether or not to become a parent, then the same right should apply to men. the man should be able to say i do not want to be involved and not be responsible if the woman chooses to have the mutant regardless. if women should have the right to choose without the consent of the men involved, then men should also have to right to choose without the women's consent. any logical women's right advocates should really be in support of such men's rights, anything less would be hypocritical. if men are to suppport women's right to choose, then men should have the same right to choose and have their decisions supported.
but then again, such hypocritical sentiment seems to permeate much of the pseudo-independent women's minds, the having the cake and eating it too mentality. yes, we want equal pay, but the men should still pay for the date; yes, we want sexal equality, but the men still need to make the first fucking move; we want equal treatment, but chivalry is so nice. every time i've spoken about chivalry as an anti-women's rights antiquated male chaunvinistic set of behavior in front of women, they always looked at me like i've just grown a third head and completely unfit for their company. think the argument through to its logical conclusion and wake the fuck up and smell your hypocrisy!