"Shadow, my sweet shadow, to you I look no more."

Dec 08, 2005 20:15

I'm selling heavenly sketches ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Re: communism darth_sauron December 10 2005, 03:53:32 UTC
oh sweet jesus. i got pwned. thank you very much for annihilating my speech. im not religoius, interesting that you know that. however, you must not know me too well.. "(need I mention the man who was president before the current one and was, no matter how hard it is do believe, actually worse then the man who is president now or shall we all try and forget that fiasco.)" as i hate clinton, and have always said he did a crappy job. your grammar and spelling has some flaws, so either you were extremely angry, or you're not a full adult. enough figuring who, countering time.
"Our economy should be I agree more centralized or at least able to support itself if other countries fall, but it should also have a far reaching nature so that we can maintain a controlled monopoly over the worlds economy." oh i sincerely do like this line, we need to control the worlds economy, and still do.
interesting that you hate ben franklin.. ive never seen anything wrong with the guy.
not bad, i did mention that i would try to cut corruption, but yes human nature plays in. you mention social contract as well, good.
american people shouldnt be trusted. nor do they have much national pride, however the communist system is idealist at best, and this whole speech was written in idealism.
btw: its a speech for history class, which u clearly know history, in fact, sounds like you're in tenth grade ap hist :O
would be nice if you left a name, could lead to more fun :D
"ow you could possibly maintain control of a government if you are little more then a figure head for what is , if not from the start then will eventually become, a corrupt comity is beyond me?" shhh, me being a figure head just sounds pretty, id have some serious power, mainly to keep out the corrupt people

Reply

Re: communism darth_sauron December 11 2005, 22:09:37 UTC
I never really considered the fact that you would think of Clinton as anything other then the incompetent bleeding heart dipper doper baby that he is. I was however trying to make a point about the fact that Americans and elections are, generally speaking of course, train wrecks waiting to happen. And this is why I am confused about why you would be handing the people elections.

You would try to cut corruption, and yet you give the American people elections? Those are really going to help, especially when the idiots voting elect people like Senator Kerry, and other people who if not corrupt are at least incompetent beyond comprehension.

Which brings me to the next point that makes little sense to me unless your trying to once again emulate Napoleon. Your going to have the power to keep corrupt people out of the government, but, your also going to give the people elections? That just screams dictator who has a few to many wires crossed. There would be little legal premises for throwing out an elected government official, and if you did it without legal provocation then the people would most likely turn on you claiming some or other rights that you were violating in denying there chosen representative the right to serve in the office they were elected to.

Don't have anything against Ben Franklin I was just eluding to a statement that he once made, sorry I should have included it. "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin. He like Marx never fully thought out what his statements but that's beside the point he had some good points and deserves respect as a great thinker and politician, of sorts, of the revolution.

I don't have a live journal, but you know me.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up