(no subject)
Let's face the facts here. My updates on LiveJournal are erratic in timing and scarce at best. I rarely check to see what anyone else has posted, not because I have no interest in what you have to say, but because I really cannot be bothered with LiveJournal. Updates are practically useless because whatever is written here will either eventually be passed by word of mouth to you, or, more likely, you were there when said event took place. Frankly, LiveJournal is not the place for deeply intimate thoughts either. The only people I can think who would post such thoughts are either in a help group in LJ or attempting to sound much deeper and philosophical than their shallow narrow mind allows. Posers, in other words. As for updates on upcoming events, you have my number. Text me.
What I'm trying to say really, is that what you write hear will probably not reach me. And if it does, it'll no doubt be too late.
However, before I go, I believe that a law is either being passed or has been passed that states all information on bomb making cannot be distributed via the internet. It is in fact illegal now. Information will always be dangerous in the wrong hands. Regardless, to try stopping the distribution of such information is against our rights. Who decides what we have a right to know? Ultimately it is not the informations fault. Fact is fact. Nor the distributor. In the end it is the perpetraitor who misuses the information. Officials attack the method, rather than the reasoning.
What I'm trying to say really, is that what you write hear will probably not reach me. And if it does, it'll no doubt be too late.
However, before I go, I believe that a law is either being passed or has been passed that states all information on bomb making cannot be distributed via the internet. It is in fact illegal now. Information will always be dangerous in the wrong hands. Regardless, to try stopping the distribution of such information is against our rights. Who decides what we have a right to know? Ultimately it is not the informations fault. Fact is fact. Nor the distributor. In the end it is the perpetraitor who misuses the information. Officials attack the method, rather than the reasoning.