I'm still sitting here trying to pick my jaw up off the floor after reading
this article in the New York Times, by a doctor who was asked to perform a tubal ligation on a patient:
Earlier this year, a patient of mine in her early 20s who was expecting her third child asked to have her tubes tied. A mother of two, with a full-time job and part-time
(
Read more... )
Reply
I'm not sure--it might. Certainly a hysterectomy isn't my first choice; my mom had one when she was in her early 40's, and there were a lot of unforseen issues that came up later. I just want to do something before I rip the fucker out with my fingernails.
I think with all doctors, you have to expect the worst and hope for the best. Can you shop around for an ob-gyn you like if you don't like this one?
Sadly, no--that's one of the downsides of Kaiser.
Reply
I imagine that you'll get counseled on the various options and they'll steer you to the ablation on the idea that it's a lot less dangerous than a full hysterectomy. It's also a lot cheaper and Kaiser tends to like to go with those options first.
Reply
Reply
I've been on Kaiser off and on since I was a kid and I'd MUCH rather be in its system than deal with for-profit insurance companies.
Reply
That said, I've had a lot of issues since then.
The ablation would probably work, but it's not 100% for birth control. They did that first on me, and took out the tumors initially, but didn't get them ALL and one kept growing (and growing and growing) back.
Tubal ligation would probably be your best bet, for birth control.
For the rest? I feel for you, I do. REALLY.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment