The Anti-Gann Entry

Apr 04, 2007 05:34

Not too sure why he gets an entry... oh well ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 9

darkcanine April 4 2007, 11:16:46 UTC
P.S. I don't care if he reads this, either. Maybe it'll make him realize what a jerk he is. My stance remains the same no matter what the outcome, even if he promises to change. It'll be like that one time I walked over to his house to give him a talking-to. He'll be like one of those domestic violence cases we hear about. Promise change, be changed for about a week up to a month, then go right back be to being shitty.

Reply


cirrusstrafe April 4 2007, 17:11:09 UTC

kage_yasha April 5 2007, 02:49:08 UTC
And just so the record is clear, I fully agree with the shit up there. >.>
Gann's been a crappy friend to all of us, and as much as I hate to say it, none of that was even a little exaggerated.
I've threatened to stop associating with him a few times, but his reaction to a supposed friend being thrown out just pissed me off - "I'm at the Family Fun Center, but I can't take him anywhere." (for clarity's sake, what he meant was he had nowhere to take him, but he could have at least seemed concerned or TRIED to figure something out) I'm no longer annoyed. I'm fucking pissed.
So screw him.

Reply


cirrusstrafe April 5 2007, 16:17:38 UTC
kage_yasha April 6 2007, 00:02:53 UTC
OOHIHAVEIT. o.o;
Iunno if he wants me to put it here though...>.>; Uh...Uh...
So basically I'm taunting now. Sorry.
Yay not thought-out replies!

Reply

kage_yasha April 6 2007, 00:54:06 UTC
I talked to him. o.o
The numbar is 615-403-6058.

Do keep in mind it is his father's cell phone, however.
Also, his da-day has to leave for work at 9:30 his time...so uh...try to call before that.

^.~ "Good luck!"

Reply


demitriomni April 6 2007, 08:06:53 UTC
Can't really riposte this, and the comment limit is too small for a response, so have a counter-entry.

http://demitriomni.livejournal.com/5414.html

Reply

darkcanine April 8 2007, 05:57:34 UTC
Kay. Whatev.

Reply

darkcanine April 8 2007, 06:39:02 UTC
Argued against in the comments.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up