(no subject)
Am I the only liberal intellectual who thinks that the decision in Kelo v. New London was clearly the right decision? I'd love to hear some arguments that explain how this ought to be a constitutional protection.
I <3 Breyer and Souter.
[Edit: P.S. Given all this wiretapping crap and the acquisition of websurfing records from many primary search engines, isn't it time we amend the constitution with a protection of our privacy? That might actually provide some decent footing for Roe v. Wade which, as it stands, I don't think was the right decision, constitutionally speaking.]
I <3 Breyer and Souter.
[Edit: P.S. Given all this wiretapping crap and the acquisition of websurfing records from many primary search engines, isn't it time we amend the constitution with a protection of our privacy? That might actually provide some decent footing for Roe v. Wade which, as it stands, I don't think was the right decision, constitutionally speaking.]