Which is something I almost never do! It's been a while since I've gone to the movies; most of what comes out these days can't overcome my inherent laziness, it seems. But after brunch on Sunday, Mrs. D. let me borrow D. and we went to see District 9.
(
District 9 )
Comments 6
Reply
Reply
P.S. I totally suffered at the hands of the "shaky cam". I was glad that the last part of the movie, there was considerably less.
Reply
Reply
The shaky camera work didn't bother me at all, but the numerous images of vomiting and limbs and heads exploding made me cover my eyes on a few occasions. I'm still debating if all that was necessary to convey the horror of what was going on or if they could have succeeded in having the same emotional impact with more cutaways.
Reply
It became clear at a certain point that the chase, and the final fight, were the big action sequences the entire film had been building up to. I didn't begrudge it to them because it's required of summer films at this point; at least it had an emotional resonance. In general, there was a momentum to the plot, building up to that, that was gripping.
I gather from an interview I read that both Neill Blomkamp and Peter Jackson were metaphorically jumping up and down and clapping at the idea of making things go "goosh"; that was a feature, not a bug. It was, at least, making a point. I'm still thinking about why it bothers me less than your typical Quentin Tarantino film.
Reply
Leave a comment