Comments | damnportlanders: oh...the love

pdx_username in damnportlanders

oh...the love

Mar 08, 2006 23:43

Taxed in 2006

Lewis and Clark:

First of all, Fuck Lewis. Meriwether,- what kind of bitch ass name is that? That’s why he was down to go out West; no one would make fun of his name with Sacajawea being the norm. Clark was a general and the first Eagle Scout as far I’m concerned. Lewis was all “my feet hurt” and “are we there yet? No wonder he ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

pdx_username March 9 2006, 08:10:35 UTC

14....I got jokes and jokes and jokes

snark on! stephen_h March 9 2006, 09:32:34 UTC

15. anti-smoking whiners. ever think that maybe some of us LIKE smoking? that maybe we're doing it to piss YOU off personally. yeah, we'll listen to you whine about it, but now it's gonna cost you a $50 tax. think of it as a discount on the hourly rate your therapist charges your bitter-sweet ass.

Re: snark on! pdx_username March 9 2006, 09:35:56 UTC

yes...it's true....i like pissing in your mouth, but they made it illegal b/c its unhealthy...like spitting on the sidewalk during the the 20's flu/plague...if only that flu could have had big douche bag cooperations making money off of it...it could have killed 100s of millions like tabacco instad of only 20 million...so weak...

Re: snark on! stephen_h March 9 2006, 09:41:58 UTC

last i heard, pissing in someone's mouth isn't illegal unless you're forcing it on them. besides, what's so bad about a product killing people if the people buy it willingly? you might as well rail on against makers of alcoholic beverages, all fast food/fatty food makers, and every other business that ever opened just about. sure, there's risks with everything, but i'm not afraid of dying.

and if you're so angry, maybe death would be a step up for you. think about it.

oh, and what's with all the spelling errors?

Re: snark on! pdx_username March 9 2006, 09:48:21 UTC

yes, i spell poorly...it doesn't kill you...like the smoke you are knocking out...for the most part, this is just fun for me...jokes...but i can't find any redeemable quality in the smoking...and neither can you..alcohol? Really, a glass or two of wine a day is good for ya...are cigarettes? Do I get alcohol poisoning when you drink? Do my kids get issues when I drinka glass or two in fron of them or eat a fatty food...they do when I smoke....please, there is no comparison....maybe crack..even that doesn't have "second hand crack"

Re: snark on! pdx_username March 9 2006, 09:54:08 UTC

By the way...this is from Phillip Morris' web site...I hope everything is speeled correctly here for you, so that you can understand it...show me another product that does this ( ... )

Re: snark on! pdx_username March 9 2006, 09:55:40 UTC

Sudden infant death syndrome...you are really defending that shits

Re: snark on! pdx_username March 9 2006, 09:42:06 UTC

also...

please give me an example on any other product that is 100% negative, with it's industry an full of evil, that explicitly states that not one of its products is benecficial and it is actually deadly...that one is not born with wanting and in fact must overcome the intial discust to enjoy...that the majority of people (at leat in this country where the ban should start) want to quit....name one other crap product like that...shit, even uzis can save... alcohol is healthy in doses and doesn't affect others...weed can help many things...so can herione...what can that shit help except kill you, me and make assholes rich...more rich

Re: snark on! stephen_h March 9 2006, 09:46:13 UTC

"give me an example on any other product"
"with it's industry an full of evil"
"the intial discust"
"at leat in this country"
"so can herione"

wait, how old are you... this debate doesn't seem fair all of a sudden.

Re: snark on! pdx_username March 9 2006, 09:50:02 UTC

it isn't when you can't talk about points and only spelling...maybe we should name this community to damnportlanders with spelling skills....

Re: snark on! stephen_h March 9 2006, 09:52:36 UTC

haha, i'm refuting your points. you're not reading what i'm writing. also, not what you're writing either, by the looks of things.

anyways, i'm not in it to win any points. i've said what i wanted to say, and i'm off. best of luck winning some converts out there, anonymous portlander.

Re: snark on! pdx_username March 9 2006, 10:32:58 UTC

Really now ( ... )

Re: snark on! stephen_h March 9 2006, 10:36:59 UTC

that's it. get angry!!!

seriously, though... i have nothing more to say to you.

Re: snark on! pdx_username March 9 2006, 10:38:51 UTC

my friend...you never really had anything to say...

Re: snark on! pdx_username March 9 2006, 10:43:28 UTC

Also....I have no problem getting angy with something that is killing hundreds of millions of people, harming many more...therefore the most destructive force in our world (not my spelling-sorry)....and the only reason we allow it is because some pricks are making a lot of money on that death...yeah, this is something that i can get angry on....can you not? Perhaps you just get angry about spelling....

Re: snark on! cougar_cowgirl March 9 2006, 15:48:03 UTC

I agree with you about smoking. I'll whine right along with you. =) Come over to Vancouver...no smoking in bars here!

Back to all threads