I never liked the idea of Splenda

Dec 10, 2005 01:35

Here's some excerpts from an article at Mercola.com

As of 2005, only six human trials have been conducted on Splenda (sucralose). Of these six trials, only two of the trials were completed and published before the FDA approved sucralose for human consumption. The two published trials had a grand total of 36 total human subjects.

36 people sure doesn't sound like many, but wait, it gets worse, only 23 total were actually given sucralose for testing and here is the real killer:

The longest trial at this time had lasted only four days and looked at sucralose in relation to tooth decay, not human tolerance.

They claim that over 100 studies have been conducted on Splenda. What they don't tell you is that most of the studies are on animals.

There have been no long-term human toxicity studies published until after the FDA approved sucralose for human consumption. Following FDA approval a human toxicity trial was conducted, but lasted only three months, hardly the length of time most Splenda users plan to consume sucralose. No studies have ever been done on children or pregnant women.

If you look at the research (which is primarily extrapolated form animal studies) you will see that in fact 15% of sucralose is absorbed into your digestive system and ultimately is stored in your body. To reach a number such as 15% means some people absorb more and some people absorb less. In one human study, one of the eight participants did not excrete any sucralose even after 3 days. Clearly his body was absorbing and metabolizing this chemical.

Bottom line If Splenda stays in your body, the probablity of the chlorine molecules they add to it breaking down and seperating out is very high. Chlorine in your body totally jacks you up. But you know if people want to slowly poison themselves because they're too lazy to burn off some extra calories from sugar, let them I guess.
Previous post Next post
Up