Comments | daikitsune: Fact Check

daikitsune

Fact Check

Oct 04, 2006 09:49

A few of you might remember the recent incident where Clinton got pissed off in a Fox News interview, and Condoleeza Rice's response the next day. Apparently a lot of people made requests that Fact Check do an analysis on Clinton's assertions in that interview. This led to a really wonderful read ( Read more... )

Comments 2

(The comment has been removed)

daikitsune October 4 2006, 23:25:39 UTC

Well alright, but in this case, it's still a good read that seems to be based mainly in facts. And they do come off very strongly on Clinton's side in this analysis, including on "Path to 9/11", which I haven't actually seen (and really have very little desire to see).

I would wonder why a "right wing front group" would dare post something showing Condi to be wrong and Clinton to be right. The fact that Cheney cited them in the 2004 debates doesn't change my opinion of them one way or the other. I'll have to look into the VoteVets thing...Sounds like a legitimate concern.

Either way, I'm not interested in the political leanings of the analysts. It's this particular analysis that I found to be built upon fact. Do you disagree, having read the article?

Totally offtopic... jharish October 19 2006, 15:50:01 UTC

...but you came up in a conversation that surprised me. AS in working with someone I used to date at Gamespot.