Apologies for not posting this sooner (big thanks to
denyce for poking me), and EVEN BIGGER APOLOGIES for dropping the ball on this challenge last year. Some RL stuff came up that I just really didn't handle well. Still kinda dealing with the aftermath of all that
(
Read more... )
2. On the details issue, I was hesitant to post this question in the poll, but there were several complaints about it last round and I really wanted everyone to be able to get their side of the argument out in the open. What my personal opinion boils down to is that, in an artist-centric challenge, artists should be allowed the freedom to take the same risks writers take when writing their own claims summaries in author-centric challenges. Artists can risk too many details the same way an author can risk not giving enough info or just summarizing poorly. You don't see artists dictating the summary-writing process in a regular bang, do you? Hell no, 'cause I'm pretty sure that wouldn't fly. Writers are not being forced to claim anything they don't want. If no one claims it, then no one claims it. If an artist is willing to deal with that outcome, it's THEIR art, and THEIR decision. Let them have the choice.
3. I voted for the "one strike, one round exclusion" rule, but I do see the points others have made about there not being a lot of people in this fandom in the first place who'll participate. Having it be two-three strikes seems reasonable to me, too. (And yeah, I know this includes me. I'm fine with whatever consequences you guys wanna dish out.)
So, that's my $0.02, for whatever it's worth to the new mod.
Reply
Leave a comment