I would consider anyone who applied to the above example a bigot. It's funny because you tell them they are bigots and they deny it, "no i just want to protect marriage im not intolerant". Yet when you pull out a dictionary and show them what they are doing, they have almost nothing to say. Its hard to blame the older folks cause they grew up that way but the definition still apply to them.
Now, if someone were to call me a faggot simply because I believe in this creedo:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."
then I would not continue having dialogue with them because they are fascists and should live somewhere else where the government has more power; I'd suggest China. The manner in which the people of this country let religion run their lives is beyond me.
Now, if someone were to call me a faggot simply because I believe in this creedo:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."
then I would not continue having dialogue with them because they are fascists and should live somewhere else where the government has more power; I'd suggest China. The manner in which the people of this country let religion run their lives is beyond me.
Reply
Leave a comment