I didn't screen your comment on purpose, but rather all comments made by people not on my friends page are screened by default. I wasn't singling you, or that comment, out in particular. Although I can understand why you'd think that.
>> The "Battle O' Friendships" is starting to draw to a close. The scales tip heavily in favour of disowning Phil > I am not in any friendships where there's a chance i could be disowned. Personaly i only like to keep friends i like/trust so competing for someone's affections isn't really my thing. That can only be a good thing, because friendships where people "battle for control" aren't very fullfilling. Other people have the same attitude as you regarding this topic, resulting in people deciding they no longer want to have you as a friend - because, like you said, having friends you don't like or trust isn't "our thing".
>> Legend has it that Phil would like to fight me. > Your arrogance seems to have got the better of you, I don't wish to fight you. I don't care enough about you to want to fight you. Should the need arise i'm also sure that you're more of a man than i in the respect that you "don't resort to physical violence". I would like to assume you know me rather well, and you're correct. I've never beed drawn in to a fight and I certainly won't start now. I am well above resorting to violence to solve any problem. Also, I'm not quite so sure I'm being arrogant, since I've been informed from three seperate sources on three seperate occasions that your intention is to rile me up to spark a fight. If this is true (either they're lying to me, or you're being melodramtic to them), it's irrelevant. I have no intention to resort to violence.
>> certain people enjoy kicking off dramas more then others > Would appear to me that this would be an attempt of such a thing, no? Could be interpreted as such. However, that is open to opinion. This is certainly no worse then people giving people the finger behind their back, attempting to punch someone, or shouting abuse in someone's face. I simply said the facts as I see them from my perspective, in my own journal.
I would reply to all given points but i feel most of your arguments are generally irrelevant (e.g. This is certainly no worse then people giving people the finger behind their back, attempting to punch someone, or shouting abuse in someone's face. i never did any such thing, two of these were acheived though, by your friend Em).
The point you need to understand is that I have nothing personally against you. You have affected my life in no way whatsoever, and I doubt you ever would. I've not hurt you, so you won't hurt me. I'd like to assume you conduct yourself in a gentlemanly fashion, much like myself, and as such would prefer to avoid confrontation then create it.
Remember that all this kicked off from my observatory comment in my journal. I'm not taking sides, I just wrote it how I saw it.
So explain The "Battle O' Friendships" is starting to draw to a close. and why you feel it necisary to stick your nose into my busines oh so very often. also removing me from your friends list (which not even karl has done yet, even if it is due to him getting a new lj) is a hostile act? I am and shal remain gentlemanly as i care not about your opinion of me. However, comments/roumers about myself and Michelle must stop as i deeply care for her and will not have my feelings for her belittled by anyone. Hope you understand.
The battle of the friends thing is coming to a close because ... well ... it is. People are starting to decide what they want to do about the situation, and that can only be a good thing, right?
I'm not sticking my nose in anywhere. Bare in mind that I posted my viewpoint on my journal. This does affect me, since it's affecting my friends. Therefore, I get to hear how they feel and such. So, yes, it is my buisness in so far that it's upsetting and/or affecting my friends. I only commented on the situation as I see it. That's not wrong.
My friends list - my choice. In no way can you use that against me.
At no time, ever, have I started "roumers" about you and Michelle. I only discuss things for which I know the facts. All I know about Michelle is she's married. I know nothing more. It doesn't affect or change anything in my life, so why would I want to go around trying to poison whatever relationship you have with her? It can not benefit me in any way.
Possibly someone else is starting these comments, but I assure you it's nothing to do with me. You should know I'm not as low, nore do I care as much to assert so much effort.
I didn't screen your comment on purpose, but rather all comments made by people not on my friends page are screened by default. I wasn't singling you, or that comment, out in particular. Although I can understand why you'd think that.
>> The "Battle O' Friendships" is starting to draw to a close. The scales tip heavily in favour of disowning Phil
> I am not in any friendships where there's a chance i could be disowned. Personaly i only like to keep friends i like/trust so competing for someone's affections isn't really my thing.
That can only be a good thing, because friendships where people "battle for control" aren't very fullfilling. Other people have the same attitude as you regarding this topic, resulting in people deciding they no longer want to have you as a friend - because, like you said, having friends you don't like or trust isn't "our thing".
>> Legend has it that Phil would like to fight me.
> Your arrogance seems to have got the better of you, I don't wish to fight you. I don't care enough about you to want to fight you. Should the need arise i'm also sure that you're more of a man than i in the respect that you "don't resort to physical violence".
I would like to assume you know me rather well, and you're correct. I've never beed drawn in to a fight and I certainly won't start now. I am well above resorting to violence to solve any problem. Also, I'm not quite so sure I'm being arrogant, since I've been informed from three seperate sources on three seperate occasions that your intention is to rile me up to spark a fight. If this is true (either they're lying to me, or you're being melodramtic to them), it's irrelevant. I have no intention to resort to violence.
>> certain people enjoy kicking off dramas more then others
> Would appear to me that this would be an attempt of such a thing, no?
Could be interpreted as such. However, that is open to opinion. This is certainly no worse then people giving people the finger behind their back, attempting to punch someone, or shouting abuse in someone's face. I simply said the facts as I see them from my perspective, in my own journal.
Reply
Reply
Remember that all this kicked off from my observatory comment in my journal. I'm not taking sides, I just wrote it how I saw it.
Reply
and why you feel it necisary to stick your nose into my busines oh so very often.
also removing me from your friends list (which not even karl has done yet, even if it is due to him getting a new lj) is a hostile act?
I am and shal remain gentlemanly as i care not about your opinion of me. However, comments/roumers about myself and Michelle must stop as i deeply care for her and will not have my feelings for her belittled by anyone.
Hope you understand.
Reply
I'm not sticking my nose in anywhere. Bare in mind that I posted my viewpoint on my journal. This does affect me, since it's affecting my friends. Therefore, I get to hear how they feel and such. So, yes, it is my buisness in so far that it's upsetting and/or affecting my friends. I only commented on the situation as I see it. That's not wrong.
My friends list - my choice. In no way can you use that against me.
At no time, ever, have I started "roumers" about you and Michelle. I only discuss things for which I know the facts. All I know about Michelle is she's married. I know nothing more. It doesn't affect or change anything in my life, so why would I want to go around trying to poison whatever relationship you have with her? It can not benefit me in any way.
Possibly someone else is starting these comments, but I assure you it's nothing to do with me. You should know I'm not as low, nore do I care as much to assert so much effort.
I hope you understand.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment