Basically, I suspected that Hisoka and Ash might have been scapegoated because they were easy targets. Added on to that was the way Takaya ran off with something I said, used it as "support" that I was probably a sheep, but didn't even get it right. It's the thing I told you about in your post with me. I felt the way he talked about it made it sound like he might actually know for a fact that I'm a sheep.
You wouldn't know that necessarily. Let's say we hadn't gotten a warning last night. If that were the case, it'd be safer to work off of a guaranteed set of three teams unless there were sufficient evidence that a specific set of clues still had its wolf.
Not really? Coming down to two, two, and two in the next round doesn't sound like an advantage to me. I wouldn't play that way if we hadn't gotten a warning.
Obviously. So if we hadn't gotten a warning, and then removed one of them tonight, and then we were told we'd gotten two wolves, we wouldn't know which set we'd missed the wolf from. Two, two, and two. That's what I mean.
I was talking about the third ousting, not the fourth. On top of that, all of this this was about why during the FIRST ousting I decided to vote on you. That early in the game you have no way of knowing what the damn turnout would be like.
That early in the game I could have gone out. But if I were a wolf I'd have to be thinking about my next step if I didn't. And it's not like I dropped the idea, I used it all through round two. I'd keep going, but I have to leave.
Because at the time I didn't have any suspicions about Itachi and Raimei. I found Itachi's responses sensible. Since it was possible they were both sheep, I went with voting to keep in the one I thought would be more helpful.
Takaya, and I'm not sure on the other two. From what I've been told, Itachi probably wouldn't have eaten David if he could help it. Despite the lack of anything shown, there's no guarantee for his safety given who the shepherd is.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Leave a comment