CFUW 129 - Ousting Three

Jul 03, 2011 19:00

... )

game 129

Leave a comment

velocivector July 4 2011, 02:03:20 UTC
Ask away.

Reply

nocturnemission July 4 2011, 02:06:43 UTC
What made you decide to vote on Takaya's team in the first ousting?

Reply

velocivector July 4 2011, 02:16:01 UTC
Basically, I suspected that Hisoka and Ash might have been scapegoated because they were easy targets. Added on to that was the way Takaya ran off with something I said, used it as "support" that I was probably a sheep, but didn't even get it right. It's the thing I told you about in your post with me. I felt the way he talked about it made it sound like he might actually know for a fact that I'm a sheep.

Reply

comesfirst July 4 2011, 02:23:55 UTC
Why would I support you at all if I knew we'd be going up again eventually?

Reply

velocivector July 4 2011, 02:30:40 UTC
You wouldn't know that necessarily. Let's say we hadn't gotten a warning last night. If that were the case, it'd be safer to work off of a guaranteed set of three teams unless there were sufficient evidence that a specific set of clues still had its wolf.

Reply

comesfirst July 4 2011, 02:35:33 UTC
Not really? Coming down to two, two, and two in the next round doesn't sound like an advantage to me. I wouldn't play that way if we hadn't gotten a warning.

Reply

velocivector July 4 2011, 02:37:24 UTC
. . . You do know that there's a wolf among Raphael's team, Black*Star's team, and Parker's team, right?

Reply

comesfirst July 4 2011, 02:42:06 UTC
Obviously. So if we hadn't gotten a warning, and then removed one of them tonight, and then we were told we'd gotten two wolves, we wouldn't know which set we'd missed the wolf from. Two, two, and two. That's what I mean.

Reply

velocivector July 4 2011, 02:45:21 UTC
I was talking about the third ousting, not the fourth. On top of that, all of this this was about why during the FIRST ousting I decided to vote on you. That early in the game you have no way of knowing what the damn turnout would be like.

Reply

comesfirst July 4 2011, 02:49:57 UTC
That early in the game I could have gone out. But if I were a wolf I'd have to be thinking about my next step if I didn't. And it's not like I dropped the idea, I used it all through round two. I'd keep going, but I have to leave.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

velocivector July 4 2011, 02:21:56 UTC
Because at the time I didn't have any suspicions about Itachi and Raimei. I found Itachi's responses sensible. Since it was possible they were both sheep, I went with voting to keep in the one I thought would be more helpful.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

velocivector July 4 2011, 02:42:23 UTC
Takaya, and I'm not sure on the other two. From what I've been told, Itachi probably wouldn't have eaten David if he could help it. Despite the lack of anything shown, there's no guarantee for his safety given who the shepherd is.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up