cfuw 100: night one

Jul 07, 2009 19:00

game 100

Leave a comment

morespecial July 8 2009, 02:06:48 UTC
Heat's team is the only one I felt was positively identified in the clue.

Reply

bitingcynicism July 8 2009, 02:07:46 UTC
That's true.

Reply

morespecial July 8 2009, 02:10:47 UTC
They had the higher odds of being the wolf team.

Reply

is_my_copilot July 8 2009, 02:10:55 UTC
Mukuro and Albert both agreed that the clue Heat and I recieved could apply to them - Albert is a tactician, and Mukuro . . . Albert says that he smiles a great deal. Mukuro did not clarify, but confirmed that it applied to him.

Reply

morespecial July 8 2009, 02:12:22 UTC
My partner knows Mukuro. If he were able to come back online, I'd ask him.

Reply

bitingcynicism July 8 2009, 02:16:06 UTC
It's tough to tell this time since the clues identified sheep too. So saying the clues could apply to them isn't automatically a sign of innocence or guilt.

Reply

is_my_copilot July 8 2009, 02:18:37 UTC
That's not what I'm saying, however. If Partnitet is one of the teams in the clues, then they have as much chance of being wolves as my team does - but in my eyes, a better chance, which is why I voted for them in suspicion.

Reply

bitingcynicism July 8 2009, 02:24:02 UTC
Though that clue could also refer to Belphegor's team since he admitted the same thing Mukuro. Yours is the only one definite for now.

Reply

is_my_copilot July 8 2009, 02:29:49 UTC
I'm sorry, but I think you're misinterpreting. Albert stated that he is a tactician. Belphegor merely mentioned tactics in his response to the event this afternoon, and said that if not team more applicable came up, he would accept that interpretation. Mukuro admitted that a part of the clue could apply to him; Albert stated that Mukuro smiles a lot. Partneritet seems a great deak more applicable to me.

Reply

bitingcynicism July 8 2009, 02:35:56 UTC
Hmm, if the clues are supposed to be split into each part, that makes sense. Unless you have some connection to a mother.

Reply

is_my_copilot July 8 2009, 02:37:26 UTC
None. I have no mother at all, as an artificially created being.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

morespecial July 8 2009, 02:12:51 UTC
So you're still voting for them in the ousting?

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

morespecial July 8 2009, 02:18:33 UTC
Agreed. Just by the odds, it's what makes the most sense.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up