Game 70 - Voting 2

[cfuw_shepherd]

Comments

[thekingsgambit]

While lack of speech from the shepherd's assistant is, of course, a noteworthy topic of consideration, I would prefer some defense from either of our suspects.

[ofthestorm]

Seconded!

[thekingsgambit]

Apparently it was of secondary concern.

[ofthestorm]

Maybe we should be voting on whoever dots more. OBVIOUSLY!

[thekingsgambit]

Perhaps.

[banhammer]

Well, I'm here.

I think the argument against me seems to be that I was in the clue, I'm acting more reserved then normal, and that my excuses are "flimsy." I would say that a game like this fosters a certain sense of reserve and that my behavior is in line with that. And also, as a intelligent person, I like to have an explanation for things that fit the current facts.

And the idea that at least one of you appears to be voting me out based on a wikipedia page seems faintly ridiculous.

[thekingsgambit]

What was the purpose behind giving your initial excuse, as that appears to be generating more suspicion than the clue itself.

[banhammer]

When I give an explanation, I give a full and complete explanation, including probable causes. I gave the only one I could think of at the time, as that was all that I had done besides pick my name at that moment.

[thekingsgambit]

Why did you think it was necessary? As Gokudera said during his defense, it was merely the first day.

[banhammer]

Believe me or don't, but I prefer to be actively thinking about any situation's causes. I'm a system administrator. It's what I do.

[thekingsgambit]

I suppose, though there could always be a far more simple explanation for the early votes against you.

[banhammer]

I supose, but I'd like to hear what it is.

[oh_im_god]

Anyone who can't recognize true genius is just an idiot.

[banhammer]

Well, I think I would much rather be an idiot under your definition then brilliant.

[oh_im_god]

Well it's fine by me if someone who doesn't know proper grammar thinks I'm an idiot!

[banhammer]

Hmph.