Let's talk shit about marriage.
In advance: Appy-polly-logies to those of y'all who have been there, done that, while I armchair critique sans experience. I sympathize that it must be heavily obnoxious to read my disjointed musings about a general Fact of Life(TM), but this will only take a moment
(
Read more... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
It's as valid, yes -- particularly if your assertion of a 50/50 divide (of both nurturing and providing) is a genuine one. In addition, I wasn't meaning to assign birth with the conclusion of parenting, quite obviously, but that a mere acknowledgment of it's physical and intimate taxation on the mother isn't quite enough, at least not for me. Of course, hand-waving nay-saying on this issue from the general populace is of the "well, being rooted in misogyny isn't indicative of it's contemporary practice" variety. Yet once again my questioning is "then why perpetuate this?" Wouldn't the mere notion of the historical affiliation with women being both property values (exchanged from father to husband) and an Incubating Host disgust the considerate person to the core, even if your present intentions are in good faith? Again, the caveat is ( ... )
Reply
True, I'm thinking more about this idea of 'identity-stamping'. Another solution: children with penises take my surname, children without take their mother's. Fair, no?
The matter isn't so important just now anyway. I have a year to think about it yet. Two, maxi.
Reply
Leave a comment