For a few years now i've refined my distaste for religion from a childhood disinterest in the fairy tales of recent millennia (unfair in contrast to my growing appreciation for those of antiquity) to a a refined and scrutinized intolerance for the stunting and controlling role faith (meaning baseless belief) currently plays in human affairs on all
(
Read more... )
My "optimist" belief and attachment to Austin can probably be, on some level, equated with faith, but I'd hate for you to label me as unreasonable and irresponsible and all the other stuff you mention above, as although it requires much faith to stick by someone when things are really hard (especially if its their fault), there's also some type of logic that goes into the argument. i.e. Is this person worth my time? Why? Why not? Does this problem have a solution? If I put up with his crap today, is he going to be good tomorrow? And maybe part (or all?) of love is finding someone whom you can enjoy while rationalizing away all of their faults or convincing yourself that you can tolerate them...
How very bleak all of this is... =P
Reply
In these terms, i understand love more as a decision than a feeling (though the feelings are crucial) or belief; you love someone when you've acknowledged their faults, even possibly disastrous ones, and resolved to pursue the relationship despite these factors working against it. By making that decision, you champion responsibility over faith; you accept the necessary likelihood of failure and act in accordance, rather than denying it and acting as though no problems exist.
To "rationalize away" the bad parts sounds to me like denying them or ignoring them. If your meaning is closer to looking past them or "filing" them, then i think we're not far removed. ^_^
Reply
Reply
Of course, this may just be me still trying to imbue the conversation with optimism. . . .
Reply
Leave a comment