(no subject)
When it is said
"you just have to beleive that it can do what you beleive it can"
what is actually meant to be conveyed is that
"if you put that beleif in place of your disposition, or exchange your disposition with its disposition, its context will manifest self-evidently"
How self-rhetorical it is to claim that one MUST beleive what one beleives to manifest that beleif;
there are many beleifs that one does not have to beleive and they still manifest; and also as all of us know "beleiving" in a beleif does not change its actual level of validity, at least most of the time.
"Beleiving" is not an invisible substance or ether that works to pressure reality to be a certain way; rather, manifesting a beleif is to place experience within its context, or to make similar ones own disposition with its disposition, which then equates into a full context of understanding and affect.
"you just have to beleive that it can do what you beleive it can"
what is actually meant to be conveyed is that
"if you put that beleif in place of your disposition, or exchange your disposition with its disposition, its context will manifest self-evidently"
How self-rhetorical it is to claim that one MUST beleive what one beleives to manifest that beleif;
there are many beleifs that one does not have to beleive and they still manifest; and also as all of us know "beleiving" in a beleif does not change its actual level of validity, at least most of the time.
"Beleiving" is not an invisible substance or ether that works to pressure reality to be a certain way; rather, manifesting a beleif is to place experience within its context, or to make similar ones own disposition with its disposition, which then equates into a full context of understanding and affect.