back at you....rhovandaeDecember 12 2002, 16:14:43 UTC
I don't think you're lazy. I know you're lazy.
CARPE PIGER ARTIFEX. Chew on that.
...and since when are you even remotely Spanish? They might not want you running around claiming things in their semi-glorious and often-downtrodden name. Ever think of that, hm?
Re: back at you....crashedhyenaDecember 23 2002, 13:15:48 UTC
I don't mind, I think you're crazy!
Anyways, I can't really claim your LJ in the name of Finland or Holland, now, can I? There's just no money in conquoring in the name of pacifist nations, y'know?
Lord of the BlingcrashedhyenaJanuary 3 2003, 23:34:53 UTC
Since when have you seen suitability as criteria for a position of authority? :>
And after all, I can always offer large sums of money as 'charritable donations' to important world leaders. But if they just happen to elect me World President afterwards, it's merely because we, heh heh, share similar political viewpoints. ;)
Re: Lord of the BlingrhovandaeJanuary 5 2003, 15:29:16 UTC
Suitability as determined by my criteria is an absolute necessity.
And you call Republicans corrupt? While you're bribing people to get to World Dominance?
Just out of curiousity, why would you want to rule the rock? The problem with you is that you're not concerned with anyone besides yourself. Which, although decreasing your stress level, would be horrid for the world if you came to power. Let's face it - if you flunk World History, you can always take it again. But if you "flunk" WWIII, the Earth will be in shambles and we'll all be living on Xanthar or some other planet. Where I'll already be, since I'll have moved off Earth on your coronation day.
Your non-loyal subjects would probably chop off your toes and leave you to rot on a nuclear waste desert island. Don't you agree?
Re: Lord of the BlingcrashedhyenaJanuary 8 2003, 21:08:47 UTC
Don't you know anything about ruling the world? The three D's. Dominate, Deliberate, and Deligate. It's that simple. Why make decisions when I can delegate someone to do it for me? And hell, there isn't a person you can't pay off when you control all the money in the world. :) It's all about dominating- and then you deligate a proxy ruler- who's decisions you can overthrow on a whim. And as long as you don't have to deal with any league of nations, or other such beaurocracy, morality issues are a moot point. ;)
Anyways, an uncaring ruler is better than a Conservative ruler who just thinks he (she?) cares. :)
Re: Lord of the BlingrhovandaeJanuary 11 2003, 12:11:27 UTC
You're a disgrace to whichever party you're currently calling yourself a supporter of, you know that? :P
Not to mention the fact that being anti-"league of nations" is a very Conservative ideal, whereas Liberals are against putting your own country's needs over those of NATO or the like.
And as far as "uncaring", you go beyond that... you'd basically be the fat cat sitting behind the world gorging off of its profits. Sometimes I wonder about you.
Re: Lord of the BlingcrashedhyenaJanuary 13 2003, 14:31:15 UTC
Did I hit you a little close to the mark, or what?! :D And anyways, to further split the hairs witchas, there is a grand diffirence between governing politics and conquoring politics. As for motive, well, it beats the hell out of paying taxes! As a Ruptublican, I thought you might agree. ;)
"I believe in a ruling class. Mostly because I rule."
CARPE PIGER ARTIFEX. Chew on that.
...and since when are you even remotely Spanish? They might not want you running around claiming things in their semi-glorious and often-downtrodden name. Ever think of that, hm?
Reply
Anyways, I can't really claim your LJ in the name of Finland or Holland, now, can I? There's just no money in conquoring in the name of pacifist nations, y'know?
Reply
All About The Money. I knew it.
Being crazy keeps me happy. Or at least mildly so. ZOOM!
Reply
It's all temporary, anyways. One day I will rule this paltry little rock, and that will be that! :D
Money is only a stepping stone to power, right?
Reply
Hrmph. The day you rule this rock will be the day I move off of it. Honestly - what makes you think you're more suited than I to reign over all?
Reply
And after all, I can always offer large sums of money as 'charritable donations' to important world leaders. But if they just happen to elect me World President afterwards, it's merely because we, heh heh, share similar political viewpoints. ;)
Reply
And you call Republicans corrupt? While you're bribing people to get to World Dominance?
Just out of curiousity, why would you want to rule the rock? The problem with you is that you're not concerned with anyone besides yourself. Which, although decreasing your stress level, would be horrid for the world if you came to power. Let's face it - if you flunk World History, you can always take it again. But if you "flunk" WWIII, the Earth will be in shambles and we'll all be living on Xanthar or some other planet. Where I'll already be, since I'll have moved off Earth on your coronation day.
Your non-loyal subjects would probably chop off your toes and leave you to rot on a nuclear waste desert island. Don't you agree?
Reply
Anyways, an uncaring ruler is better than a Conservative ruler who just thinks he (she?) cares. :)
Reply
Not to mention the fact that being anti-"league of nations" is a very Conservative ideal, whereas Liberals are against putting your own country's needs over those of NATO or the like.
And as far as "uncaring", you go beyond that... you'd basically be the fat cat sitting behind the world gorging off of its profits. Sometimes I wonder about you.
Reply
"I believe in a ruling class. Mostly because I rule."
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment