Work sucks but then Bruce comes over and suggests I could "spice up the FYI with an update on Ballard every week." [eta: This made me laugh loudly, as intended. He has the best dry humor of anyone in this place
( Read more... )
Yes, I did know about the astronomical rates of domestic violence/rape perpetrated on Native women, but not the exact number. Law digression ahead: one of the bigger reasons for this is that lots of Native women have non-Native SOs, and those guys are not under the jurisdiction of tribes. Also, because the feds are either (a) incompetent or (b) (more likely) severely underfunded when it comes to reservation law enforcement, they don't prosecute male, non-Indian rapists/wife-beaters who do so against Indian women. States can't prosecute these guys (if it happens on reservation), and tribes can't prosecute these guys (thanks to the right-wing Supreme Court and Congress - tribes have no jurisdiction over non-Indians, even for crimes committed on reservation and against Indians), and feds . . . well, they have "higher law enforcement priorities
( ... )
I can't believe I didn't know that tribes have no jurisdiction over what happens on reservations if it involves white people (essentially--have I got that right?). That's a lot like saying we can do whatever we want in other nations just because we're not from there, isn't it? This is amazing (amazingly fucked up!!!)--yet again, after the initial shock, it is not surprising at all.
I kind of abruptly ended my sentence about feeling like I'm not part of it--and so how do I do anything about it? Well, your thanks for posting it makes me at least think that, as with so many issues, just talking/posting about it could be an important step. In fact maybe I'll propose a piece for the magazine--if I do, I will probably ask you for a lot of help.
I am developing a whole new appreciation for your D's chosen work.
Yeah, it's basically right. But of course, as with most things legal, it's more complicated than that. But yeah - if you're not an Indian (and before 1990 (I think) if you weren't a member of the tribe on whose reservation you committed the crime), you can't be prosecuted according to the laws of the tribe on whose reservation you're perpetratin
( ... )
Mm, yes I see and am guessing at some of the other complications (I'm just slightly familiar with the lineage issues. Emphasis on "slightly.") Here's a shock: my opinion is that it's your damn choice if you move to a country/nationstate/etc where you cannot naturalize and therefore participate.
well, probably (unless I detail all the condos going up), but that's local news. (the FYI is our work newsletter that I write every week. the VAWA/reservation article would possibly be for Punk Planet, a national magazine. but i have to pitch it to the editor.)
Comments 10
Reply
I kind of abruptly ended my sentence about feeling like I'm not part of it--and so how do I do anything about it? Well, your thanks for posting it makes me at least think that, as with so many issues, just talking/posting about it could be an important step. In fact maybe I'll propose a piece for the magazine--if I do, I will probably ask you for a lot of help.
I am developing a whole new appreciation for your D's chosen work.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment