Election Stories

[cos]

I wrote last month that I've been blogging for John Bonifaz, and I've posted links to some of my blog posts on coslinks, which only a few of you (comparatively) read. I've spent so much time trying to make the blog interesting for other readers, but I wonder whether many of the people I actually know have seen much of it. So...

• Yesterday, Arizona's

Comments

[roamin_umpire]

I took a look at the Constitution. It seems that the judge in the California case was correct: Article I, Section 5, Clause 1 states that "Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members..."

The gerrymandering is pretty impressive, and has received almost no press that I'm aware of outside of MA. (Unlike, say, the TX fiasco a couple of years back. Then again, it took the entire minority leaving the state and having the Texas Rangers sent after them to make national news.)

It's almost enough to make one want to get into politics.

[cos]

If you took that interpretation at face value, the House leadership could swear in whichever candidate they preferred, regardless of election results - even a candidate who clearly and obviously lost. I doubt that was the intent.

Also, the particularly unusual thing here is that the House swore Bilbray in before his election results were certified in the first place.

Tab Cards are still best voting method but need a verfication cycle

[anonymous]

Tab Card systems are still the best voting method, but need a verification cycle. During the most properous times in U.S. history, corporations flourished using tab cards systems. However, they would reject the tab card voting systems because all data would be considered raw data until going through a verification cycle. The old tab card voting systems did not have this

Hola faretaste

[anonymous]

Hola faretaste
mekodinosad