Again I reference the US Military treatment of Nazi Werewolf squads. They were "interrogated" on the spot then shot and left to rot. I have no issue with this. As far as gaining knowledge I again have no issue with NON-UNIFORMED combatants being tortured. P.O.W.'s however can be asked and then sent to a P.O.W. Camp, an important difference.
Did it happen? arguably yes. Was it explictly against the laws at the laws even at the time? yes (although it was indeed an order to shoot them on sight. Torture was never authorised however)
Do we have different laws on treatment of 'unlawful combatants' in 2007, yes we do.
The label is as inaccurate as the assertion. Nothing new from such a bastion of Liberal ethics. Good for you for managing to answer his question after the second time it was asked. That's a huge improvement.
Well lets pretend for one instant you are here to argue honestly. Which would be a stretch but anyway. Whether or not the werwolves were shot out of hand in WWII it is not legal now, not was it legal then (although it was ordered from the information I have)
So the -main- part of his point that it is justified/legal whatever after capture to torture and then kill them without any trial by the current laws of land warfare is bullshit. It is explicitly illegal now.
Reply
Reply
Do we have different laws on treatment of 'unlawful combatants' in 2007, yes we do.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
So the -main- part of his point that it is justified/legal whatever after capture to torture and then kill them without any trial by the current laws of land warfare is bullshit. It is explicitly illegal now.
Reply
Reply
Enjoy your yipping.
Reply
What's this, the fourth time in one conversation you're stealing my lines, and poorly? You people get worse daily.
Reply
Leave a comment