lawyer grammar queenbing_crosbyMay 12 2008, 02:23:31 UTC
emphasis only, I would think. And let me test this out-- like "or" vs "and/or," it's more vague than the shorter version while claiming to be more specific.
Re: lawyer grammar queencommandercrankyMay 12 2008, 03:54:08 UTC
I wasn't sure when I posted this, but I've thought about it more and I think there is an important difference. I disagree that the longer version is vague. It's the shorter version that is less specific.
For example (to borrow from vampyrecat), imagine two different rules:
1. If you clean your room you get a cookie.
2. If and only if you clean your room you get a cookie.
Under rule 1 there might be other ways to get a cookie, but we know this is one way. Under rule 2 you're stuck - you better clean your room if you want a cookie, because there's no other option.
Reply
For example (to borrow from vampyrecat), imagine two different rules:
1. If you clean your room you get a cookie.
2. If and only if you clean your room you get a cookie.
Under rule 1 there might be other ways to get a cookie, but we know this is one way. Under rule 2 you're stuck - you better clean your room if you want a cookie, because there's no other option.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Anyway, yes there is a difference and this is it.
Reply
Leave a comment