Item one: the difference in spelling between the
front cover and
spine.
Item two: "
Female SF writers are a rarity; good ones even scarcer!"
If anyone wants to play guess-the-publisher before clicking through to the photos, feel free. That said, I'm still looking forward to reading it.
Reply
Reply
I realise that if I ever get back into writing fiction I shall have to save it all up until I can be marketed as Splendid Ancient Crone (whacking people with my cane, waving my ear-trumpet at them, and bringing antimaccassars into the conversation somehow. But NOT wearing a red hat with purple). There is no hype to be got out of being middle-aged.
Reply
Of course, the vocabulary available for putting on proofs has almost all be used at least twice already though, so sometimes it's just a game to see just how many clichés you can get onto a jacket.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The posts keep moving for youth. F/SF has yet to meet its Daisy Ashford, but surely she is out there.
Reply
Reply
Jaine
Reply
Interesting that you don't seem to think they'd need to indicate if the author was a man :-p
Reply
I think the lack of indication of Alex Bell's gender may be a case of 'don't tell, don't ask'.
... That said, my friend and I were talking about what he'd been reading lately a couple of weeks ago, and I asked him if he had read anything by China Mieville. He said he'd seen her name bandied about a lot but wasn't sure if she wrote his sort of thing.
Reply
Reply
Reply
That said, having looked at all the Gollancz proofs I have sitting around, it is the only one not to mention the author's gender. Admittedly most of the others have non-gender-ambiguous names on them, but still.
Reply
I think the word you should be using here is sex not gender.
Sex is biological. Gender is a societal construct. I think you're discussing the sex of these authors not their gender.
Reply
Leave a comment