Im glad you caught that one too! I hope more people are aware of these things but ive seen far to many that dont realize it. I don'ty think i know more, I just want to make maybe one person aware and show that Im not a sedated idiot!
Ooo a spelling insult, yet another arguement thats has nothing to do with this! Wow you really have no good points!
What good would have arresting done? Well your Mr.Humaintaria here. Its quite possible one of those protestors was a bomber or had links to the bombers. Areestign him would stop his death and the deaths of many others...you of all people shoudl see that. Arresting people tends to prevent a crime which woudl otherwise occur. You need to understand that it may have and may not have made a difference. These were threats against innocent people and their countries...that sou8dns pretty dangerous to me. After all they said BOMB LONDON! And what happened? I thought Islam was peaceful thus making these guys extremists which is viewed as wrong. And they were breakign the law! Thats why you arrest them...
Canada is full of other cultures....thats because our birthrate is declining and we need immagrant owrkers to stay funcational. Its not very freindly of you to thik Cnada is a shithole either!
[quote]Ooo a spelling insult, yet another arguement thats has nothing to do with this! Wow you really have no good points![/quote]
It does have something to do with it when someone is talking about "intelligence" The point was none of us are paradigms so stfu kthx.
"What good would have arresting done? Well your Mr.Humaintaria here. Its quite possible one of those protestors was a bomber or had links to the bombers. Areestign him would stop his death and the deaths of many others...you of all people shoudl see that."
no, what I see is: Likelihood of bomber standing around admitting that he's going to do bombing later on = UNLIKELY.
"Arresting people tends to prevent a crime which woudl otherwise occur. You need to understand that it may have and may not have made a difference. These were threats against innocent people and their countries...that sou8dns pretty dangerous to me. After all they said BOMB LONDON! And what happened? I thought Islam was peaceful thus making these guys extremists which is viewed as wrong. And they were breakign the law! Thats why you arrest them..."
It's not breaking the law to WANT something BAD to happen. I fucking CHEERED for 9/11, I jumped up and down and clapped when I watched those towers collapse live. BEST EVENT ON TV. But that's not illegal. Maybe now, but not back when we still had a few freedoms or at least pretended to.
I guarantee the people chanting bomb london had nothing to do with the bombings in london. The ones responsible for bombing london are the ones who did something. Not the ones who stand around and talk about it.
It's like saying you or andrew would be the ones responsible for a radical change in homeland security. You aren't. You talk about it.
Ooo a spelling insult, yet another arguement thats has nothing to do with this! Wow you really have no good points!
What good would have arresting done? Well your Mr.Humaintaria here. Its quite possible one of those protestors was a bomber or had links to the bombers. Areestign him would stop his death and the deaths of many others...you of all people shoudl see that. Arresting people tends to prevent a crime which woudl otherwise occur. You need to understand that it may have and may not have made a difference. These were threats against innocent people and their countries...that sou8dns pretty dangerous to me. After all they said BOMB LONDON! And what happened? I thought Islam was peaceful thus making these guys extremists which is viewed as wrong. And they were breakign the law! Thats why you arrest them...
Reply
Reply
Reply
It does have something to do with it when someone is talking about "intelligence" The point was none of us are paradigms so stfu kthx.
"What good would have arresting done? Well your Mr.Humaintaria here. Its quite possible one of those protestors was a bomber or had links to the bombers. Areestign him would stop his death and the deaths of many others...you of all people shoudl see that."
no, what I see is: Likelihood of bomber standing around admitting that he's going to do bombing later on = UNLIKELY.
"Arresting people tends to prevent a crime which woudl otherwise occur. You need to understand that it may have and may not have made a difference. These were threats against innocent people and their countries...that sou8dns pretty dangerous to me. After all they said BOMB LONDON! And what happened? I thought Islam was peaceful thus making these guys extremists which is viewed as wrong. And they were breakign the law! Thats why you arrest them..."
It's not breaking the law to WANT something BAD to happen. I fucking CHEERED for 9/11, I jumped up and down and clapped when I watched those towers collapse live. BEST EVENT ON TV. But that's not illegal. Maybe now, but not back when we still had a few freedoms or at least pretended to.
I guarantee the people chanting bomb london had nothing to do with the bombings in london. The ones responsible for bombing london are the ones who did something. Not the ones who stand around and talk about it.
It's like saying you or andrew would be the ones responsible for a radical change in homeland security. You aren't. You talk about it.
Reply
Leave a comment